pf_03435 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

C. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: The improvements proposed will add an amenity to the home that is characteristic to many home built today. The design of the Seal addition will not be out of character or context ofa home built in the late 1970's. The abutting lots to the east have deeper rear setbacks and will not be impacted. The Community Development Staff has determined that this variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality, nor adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. 6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Based on the information provided and the findings in Section 5 of this project report, staff recommends approval of a 6 to 8 foot rear yard variance to Section 1004.02D5 and a 4% impervious coverage variance (339 sq. ft.) to Section 1004.01A6 of the Roseville City Code for John & Martha Seal, subject to the following conditions: A All building and site improvements shall not exceed 3,054 square feet of . . ImpervIOUS area. B Exposing the rear yard comer pins (lot comers) to verify the approved setback of 24 feet (6 foot encroachment). C The dining room addition being limited to a 16 foot extension of the existing principal structure, as indicated on the plans. D The review and approval of a building permit consistent with the approved plans and variance. E The installation of roof gutters along the southern side to properly direct roof drainage away from the adjacent property. 7.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 7.1 On Wednesday, November 6,2002 the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Seal variance request. At the hearing the City Planner made a brief presentation detailing the specifics of the variance request and answered questions by the Commission. The applicant had nothing further to add to the presentation. The adjoining property owner (1950 County Road D) addressed the Commission supporting the Seal variance request. The City Planner received no objections (via e-mail, telephone call, or letter) to the variance request. 7.2 The Planning Commission recommend approval (7-0) ofa 6 foot rear yard variance to Section 1004.02D5 and a 4% impervious coverage variance (339 sq. ft.) to Section 1004.01A6 of the Roseville City Code to allow the addition of a dining room for John & Martha Seal, 3110 Evelyn Street, based on the findings in Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated November 6, 2002. PF3435 - ReA 111802 - Page 4 of 5