Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br /> OF THE <br /> CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br /> of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held on the 28th of January, 2013, <br /> at 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> The following members were present: McGehee, Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, Roe and the <br /> following were absent: None. <br /> Councilmember McGehee introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION No. 11044 <br /> RECEIVING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AT <br /> 3040 HAMLINE AND ORDERING PUBLIC HEARING FOR IMPROVEMENT <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted November 19, 2012, a report <br /> has been prepared by the City Engineer with reference to the construction of public <br /> sanitary sewer and watermain at 3040 Hamline Avenue, and; <br /> WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is <br /> necessary, cost effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in <br /> connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as <br /> recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual <br /> assessments for affected parcels. <br /> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br /> ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> 1. The City Council will consider the construction of sanitary sewer and watermain in <br /> accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of <br /> the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 at an estimated <br /> total cost of the improvement of$77,985.14. <br /> 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 25th day of <br /> February, 2013, in the council chambers of the city hall at 6:00 p.m. and the City <br /> Engineer shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as <br /> required by law. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member <br /> Etten, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> McGehee, Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, Roe and the following voted against the same: <br /> None. <br /> WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />