My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03438
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03438
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:27:10 PM
Creation date
8/10/2005 8:46:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3438
Planning Files - Type
Division of Land
Address
331 Burke Ave
Project Name
Humphreys, Dennis & Patricia
Applicant
Humphreys, Dennis & Patricia
Status
Approved
PIN
132923120090
Date Final City Council Action
1/28/2002
Date Final Planning Commission Action
1/8/2002
Planning Files - Resolution #
10065
Additional Information
Varuabce and Minor Subdivision
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Extract of Draft Minutes: Planning Commission meeting 01/08/03: <br /> <br />b. Plannintr File 3438: A request by Dennis Humphreys for a Minor <br />Subdivision and Variance to allow a division of land at 331 Burke Avenue. <br /> <br />Chair Duncan opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke <br />provide a summary of the project report dated January 8, 2003. <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke explained the history of "flag lots" and a proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />Dennis & Patricia Humphreys have applied for a 45 foot variance and a minor <br />subdivision to allow their 1.15 acre parcel at 331 Burke Avenue to be divided <br />into two parcels; one with the existing home and the second for a new home to be <br />occupied by the Humphreys. <br /> <br />The Humphrey parcel has an existing width of 154.47 feet, a depth of322.5 feet, <br />and a size of 49,817 square feet (1.15 acres). The proposed parcels would have <br />widths of 114 feet for the existing homestead and 40.47 feet for the new parcel; a <br />depth of 160 feet for the existing homestead and a varying depth of 322.5 and <br />162 feet for the new parcel; and the parcels would have an area of 18,240 square <br />feet for the existing homestead and 31,577 square feet for the new parcel. <br /> <br />The parcel created for the existing homestead would provide ample setback from <br />side (15 feet on the west) and rear yards 80+ feet on north). The new parcel <br />creates a "flag lot" that is 40 feet in width, a deficiency of 45 feet to the 85 foot <br />minimum width requirement. However, the new parcel depth and square footage <br />exceed the requirements of the Roseville City Code. <br /> <br />The Humphrey parcel is the largest in the neighborhood except for the Minnesota <br />Islamic Cemetery (northeast). The Humphrey parcel is also the on Iv parcel in the <br />neighborhood that can adequately accommodate two residences. The proposed <br />division and proposed home location would have little impact on neighboring <br />properties given the deep lots that lie to the west and north, as well as the home <br />locations along Burke Avenue. <br /> <br />The Community Development Staff recommends approval of the request by <br />Dennis & Patricia Humphreys for a 45 foot Variance and Minor Subdivision of <br />property located at 331 Burke Avenue, subject to the conditions indicated in <br />Section 6 of this project report. <br /> <br />Chair Duncan asked for clarification of two lots to the east of the Humphrey lots <br />(two landlocked parcels). Chair Duncan asked for concerns regarding running <br />utilities to serve the new parcel. (No, private service to public utilities at right-of- <br />way). <br /> <br />Mr. Humphreys stated he was satisfied with content of staffreport. He said there <br />is a IOding area to the north and east of his proposed site; it could not be filled <br />m. <br /> <br />Rose Anne Pearle, 2112 Hand Avenue (owner of property to the west of the new <br />lot) indicated there will be adequate space from her lot and the pond, and the <br />separation was satisfactory. She was supportive ofthe proposal. <br /> <br />There being no further comments, Chair Duncan closed the hearing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.