My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03439
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03439
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:27:24 PM
Creation date
8/10/2005 9:27:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3439
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
Project Name
City of Roseville
Applicant
City of Roseville
Status
Non-Active
Additional Information
Accessory building units study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Minneapolis Planning Department <br />350 South Fifth Street, Room 210 <br />Minneapolis, MN 55415-1385 <br />(612) 673-2597 Phone <br />(612) 673-2728 Fax <br />(612) 673-2157 TDD <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />November 12,2002 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Gary Schiff, Zoning and Planning Committee Chair <br />Zoning and Planning Committee Members <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Kimberly Tollefson, City Planner <br />612.673.2998 <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Accessory Dwelling (AD) Overlay District <br /> <br />Planning Department Revisions and Alternative: <br />The Planning Department recommends approval of the Accessory Dwelling Overlay as attached <br />in the Planning Department's Alternative. At this time, Planning recommends that no additional <br />overlay boundaries be established. Planning staff recommends a trial study with a twelve to <br />eighteen month status report to the Planning Commission and the Zoning and Planning <br />Committee. The update would include established criteria to assess the success of the AD <br />Overlay District. The assessment of this amendment's success may determine if and where other <br />neighborhoods in the city should be mapped with the overlay and may suggest amended policies <br />to the text. <br /> <br />Based on discussions at the Planning Commission and Zoning and Planning Committee level, <br />staff has revised the text of the overlay. The difference between the Planning Commission <br />Recommendation and the Planning Department Alternative are as follows: <br /> <br />1. Section 551.1050. Minimum Zoned Area. <br /> <br />The addition of this provision suggests that consensus must be built within an area before <br />the addition of overlay zoning is sought. The provision avoids a piecemeal approach to <br />the review and recommendation of zoning requests. A two-acre minimum zoned area is <br />recommended. <br /> <br />2. Section 551.1060(1). Conditional uses. <br /> <br />The Planning Department Alternative requires that the principal residential structure be <br />allowed in the primary district. For example, a multiple-family dwelling in an R2B <br />District would not be eligible to add an accessory dwelling. <br /> <br />3. Section 551.1060(2). Conditional Uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.