Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Proposed Council Minutes <br />Regular Meeting of June 11,2002 <br />Page 6 of 14 <br /> <br />Motion was made b Councilmember Johnson and seconded b Councilmember BI to direct <br />staff to re are a Resolution with findin s of fact that would be consistent with roval for the <br />June 25 meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Harstad and Slavik stated they wo <br /> <br /> <br />members voting in favor, the motion carried. <br /> <br />Mayor Tierney stated she would support the motion. This lot div' . n would not adversely affect <br />the neighbors. <br /> <br />There being no further discussion and wit <br /> <br />Councilmember Harstad asked i e Council should be reviewing whether to reduce the lot sizes <br />for older neighborhoods on ase-by-case basis. <br /> <br />Mayor Tierney st the Council previously decided that this would be discussed on a case-by- <br />case basis. S oted that the majority of the new developments do have homes being <br />constructed on smaller lots. <br /> <br /> <br />(8.2) Consideration of Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to Provide a Definition for <br />Accessory Dwelling Units and Allow Accessory Dwelling Units on Certain Single-Family <br />Lots Approved after June 1,2001, with an Administrative Permit (2002006) <br /> <br />Community Development Director Hurlburt reported on a proposed Zoning Ordinance Text <br />amendment to provide a definition for accessory dwelling units and to allow the units on certain <br />single-family lots with an administrative permit. She stated draft regulations pertaining to <br />accessory dwelling units were originally presented to the Council on January 22, 2002 as part of <br />the annual update to the Zoning Ordinance. The draft regulations presented at that time would <br />have allowed accessory dwelling units on all single-family lots upon issuance of an <br />administrative permit. The Council decided to remove all language pertaining to accessory <br />dwelling units from the annual update to allow for more in-depth review and discussion of the <br />proposed Ordinance. The Council also expressed that a public review process should be required <br />if accessory dwelling units were to be allowed within established neighborhoods. <br /> <br />She stated the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on February 20, 2002 and <br />recommended that accessory dwelling units be allowed on all single-family lots upon issuance of <br />a Conditional Use Permit which would allow a process for public input. <br /> <br />She noted that on April 16, 2002, the Council conducted a Study Session to review the proposed <br />Ordinance. Councilmembers expressed differing thoughts as to whether accessory dwelling <br />units should require a Conditional Use Permit or an administrative permit, but by the end of the <br />meeting there appeared to be a general consensus that they could be allowed by an administrative <br />permit if limited to newer developments. Staff has revised the proposed Ordinance, and it would <br />allow accessory dwelling units within residential subdivisions that have received preliminary plat <br />approval on June 1, 2001. The Ordinance would also require the subdivision to include 10 or <br />