Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Proposed Council Minutes <br />Regular Meeting of June 11,2002 <br />Page 8 of 14 <br /> <br />Councilmember Stein stated the maximum square footage of the accessory dwelling unit could <br />be 1,000 square feet, and if a property owner had a 1,000 square foot detached garage, this type <br />of structure could essentially be larger than the principal dwelling unit. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Hurlburt discouraged the Council from eliminating these <br />units on detached garages, as this type of use would allow for a carriage house design. She <br />stated some of the more attractive uses for accessory dwelling units were with detached garages. <br /> <br />Councilmember Johnson stated that she could be concerned if a property owner constructs a <br />detached garage after the home is built, and then an accessory dwelling unit is constructed on top <br />of the garage. She would be very concerned about the design of the structure. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Hurlburt stated there could be the similar problem with an <br />attached garage that is added after the home is constructed. She stated an attached garage <br />doesn't have to be constructed the same time the house is built. <br /> <br />Councilmember Stein stated that being the case, perhaps there should be an architectural review <br />of the design of the structure or a Conditional Use Permit process. <br /> <br />Councilmember Slavik suggested there be a Conditional Use Permit process rather than an <br />administrative permit. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Hurlburt stated the property owner would have the right to <br />appeal to the Council if they would disagree with staff s ruling on the design of the structure. <br /> <br />Councilmember Stein stated he would also support a Conditional Use Permit process for any <br />accessory dwelling unit over a detached garage. This type of process would also allow the <br />neighbors to be notified. <br /> <br />Councilmember Slavik stated that she assumed the accessory dwelling units would be <br />constructed simultaneously as the development is being constructed. However, that not being <br />the case, future accessory dwelling units could impact the residential character of the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Councilmember Johnson spoke to the amendment and stated that she preferred that accessory <br />dwelling units are included in the original building plans filed with the City for the development. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Hurlburt reminded the Council that accessory dwelling units <br />wouldn't be allowed in the Seven Greens development if this use isn't allowed in the Zoning <br />Ordinance and ifthe effective date isn't June 1,2001. <br /> <br />Motion was made by Councilmember Black, and seconded by Councilmember Johnson, to call <br />the question. With Slavik, Stein, Hewitt, and Tierney voting no, and Johnson, Black, and <br />Harstad voting yes, the motion failed. <br />