Laserfiche WebLink
<br />JUL.15'2002 17:04 952 941 7968 <br />'. <br /> <br />HOFF BARRY KUDERER <br /> <br />#1292 p.005 <br /> <br />'....... <br /> <br />......,..,.' <br /> <br />contiguous properties, the impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties~ and the <br /> <br />--- ~~~- <br /> <br />co~b~~~~~hth:_~!~~~~~~~~h~n~We Plan. <br />18. While purporting to make findings With regard to the impact of the proposed use on the <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />general public health, s~fet~~t~d welfare, the findings as adopted by the City failed to refute or <br />.. 11'\ ... <br />ctheIWise ccnSider~Pert ;e~tirn~ the record offered by Ros.lawn in support of its npplicntiorl <br /> <br />19. In opposing.tRe-Cit)"s deniol, Council Member Craig Klausing stated at tbe City <br /> <br />Council's August 27,2001 meeting: <br /> <br />'~The code goes on to tell us the sort of factors that we can consider in considering a <br />conditional use permit. . . . If you take a look at the [mdings we have no finding that will <br />have a negative impact On traffic. We have no finding that will have a negative impa~t <br />on parks, streets, and other public facilities, We have no finding that will have a <br />negative impact on the market value of contiguous properties. And we have no finding <br />that it's incompatible with. the city's comprehensive plan. . . . Yau will not fInd proposed <br />findings in there addressing those issues and the reason. . . [is] that we haveo1t <br />developed those findings. We don't have a basis. . . . And I wouldn't have a problem <br />with basing our decision solely on [a conclusion that the proposed use will have a <br />negative impact on the general health) sare~:y and welfare] if we had developed a factual <br />basis to reach such a conc::ltlSion. But it's my concern that we haven"e' <br /> <br />20. Roselawn now brings this action before this Court pursuant to Minn. Stat. ~ 452.361. <br /> <br />subd. I, which provides that: <br /> <br />Any person aggrieved by an ordinance, rule, l'egulation. decision or order of a <br />governing body or board of adjustments and appeals ncting p\ll:'suant to sections <br />462.351 to 462.364 may have such ordinance) rule, regulation., deci~ion or order, <br />reviewed by an appropriate remedy in the district Court. . .. <br /> <br />HC26DS4/IOIII ~GS5245a.\l1 6fl;l4001 <br /> <br />4 <br />