Laserfiche WebLink
<br />20. With respect to Paragraphs 22 and 23, admit that the Plaintiff receives ajusticiable <br /> <br />controversy between the parties, deny the remaining allegations of said paragraphs, specifically <br /> <br />including that the City improperly denied the Plaintiff's CUP Application. <br /> <br />21. Deny Paragraphs 24, 25 and 26. <br /> <br />22. As and for affirmative defenses, the City ofRoseville states: <br /> <br />a. Plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. <br /> <br />b. Plaintiff's claims for damages, if any, are barred by the immunities <br /> <br />afforded to the City ofRoseville including, without limitation, official <br /> <br />immunity and immunities afforded under Minn. Stat. 466.03. <br /> <br />c. The actions of the City ofRoseville are not arbitrary and capricious. <br /> <br />d. Damages, if any, purportedly suffered by the Plaintiff, are the result of <br /> <br />their own actions or inactions. <br /> <br />WHEREFORE, the City ofRoseville asks for judgment of the above-entitled Court <br /> <br />dismissing Plaintiff's pretended cause of action and awarding to the City its costs and <br /> <br />disbursements herein. <br /> <br />Dated: <br /> <br />;/// <br />( - <br /> <br />,2002 <br /> <br /> <br />Geo ge . off(#4 8 6) <br />Justin L. Templin (#030 807) <br />Hoff, Barry & Kuderer, P.A. <br />160 Flagship Corporate Center <br />775 Prairie Center Drive <br />Eden Prairie, MN 55344 <br />(952) 941-9220 <br /> <br />Attorneys for Defendant <br />City of Roseville <br /> <br />3 <br />