My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_0126_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_0126_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2015 1:16:31 PM
Creation date
1/22/2015 2:19:50 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date: 1/26/2015 <br /> Item No.: 13.a <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br />Item Description: Receive a Summary Recap of the 2015 Adopted Tax Levy and Budget <br />B <br />ACKGROUND <br />1 <br />During the 2015 budget process, the Council indicated a desire to receive a summary recap of the <br />2 <br />formal actions taken on the tax levy and budget and to revisit the projected budget surplus from 2014. <br />3 <br />A brief summary for each of these items is presented below. <br />4 <br />5 <br />Projected 2014 Budget Surplus <br />6 <br />In early December, Staff projected a 2014 General Fund budget surplus of approximately $200,000. <br />7 <br />The projected surplus was calculated by observing aggregate expenditures through November and <br />8 <br />extrapolating that amount over the remainder of the year. At the time, it was noted that the City <br />9 <br />typically incurs over $1 million dollars in expenditures during the months of December and January <br />10 <br />that need to be recorded in 2014 before an accurate measure of the surplus can be determined. <br />11 <br />12 <br />Based on known expenditures through January 16th, it appears that the 2014 General Fund budget <br />13 <br />surplus will be closer to $225,000. Again, this estimate could change over next month as final <br />14 <br />payments and audit corrections for 2014 are recorded. The surplus was largely the result of less-than- <br />15 <br />expected personnel costs due to staff turnover, which was somewhat offset by lower-than-expected tax <br />16 <br />collections due to valuation appeals. <br />17 <br />18 <br />Employee positions that remain unfilled for a period of time create vacancy savings. Additional <br />19 <br />savings are also realized when the City hires less-experienced staff that begin at the lower end of the <br />20 <br />pay scale compared to the previous employee that held the position. <br />21 <br />22 <br />With this amount, the unrestricted General Fund cash reserve would be approximately $5,991,480, for a <br />23 <br />reserve level of 43% compared to the 2015 General Fund Budget. The City’s Cash Reserve Policy calls <br />24 <br />for reserve level of 35-45% of the Budget. The 2015 Budget projects a draw-down of these reserves in <br />25 <br />the amount of $375,500. If this proves accurate, the cash reserve level would be at 40% by the end of <br />26 <br />2015. <br />27 <br />28 <br />2015 Tax Levy <br />29 <br />As adopted on December 8, 2014, the 2015 Tax Levy was $18,276,902, an increase of $273,181 or <br />30 <br />1.5%. This was $382,148 lower than the amount presented at the truth-in-taxation hearing, and <br />31 <br />$617,648 lower than the amount presented in the City Manager Recommended Budget. <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />Page 1 of 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.