Laserfiche WebLink
35 be available for all of the taxing authorities and assuming all other variables remain constant, <br />ss each will receive the higher level of taxes that are now created by the redevelopment which <br />37 should make the use of TIF revenue positive over the long term. A city is authorized to keep a <br />sa district open to fulfill all district obligations and eligible expenditures as outlined in the TIF Plan, <br />ss up to the maximum term of the TIF District. All projects financed with TIF must meet the `but - <br />40 for' test, meaning that the proposed development and redevelopment project would not proceed <br />41 `but for' the use of TIF. There can sometimes be negative feedback from the public or other <br />42 taxing authorities regarding the `but for' test and use of TIF if cities leave districts open in place <br />43 for the maximum term to finance multiple projects as outlined in the TIF Plan. At times TIF <br />44 funds are being accumulated for certain projects (such as future phases of development, planned <br />45 capital improvement projects, etc.) To a lesser extent, TIF districts can also generate negative <br />46 feedback because they do not adjust the baseline values to account for inflation, but the scale of <br />47 that issue is generally dwarfed by the positive gains from the redevelopments over time. <br />48 TIF districts now have what are referred to as "knockdown rules" to ensure that the district is <br />49 sized at the minimum size to accomplish the policy objective and that development activity is <br />50 occurring. The knockdown rules as well as the constantly ticking expiration clock on TIF <br />51 districts provides some incentive to create smaller, project specific districts rather than large, <br />52 "catch all" TIF districts. <br />53 By law, TIF may not be used for general government purposes <br />54 RISKS AND BENEFITS RELATED TO How TIF IS PROVIDED <br />55 Pay as you go: The lowest risk method for providing TIF is with the "pay as you go" model <br />56 because the City is not incurring a financing risk. The structure of the "pay as you go" <br />57 agreement can be structured in ways to transfer virtually all risk to the developer through the use <br />58 of minimum assessment agreements and placing caps on the maximum amount of benefit which <br />59 can be received by the recipient. The proposed project is generally known at the time of the <br />so financing commitment and therefore the City can negotiate directly with the end users to ensure <br />61 the development is meeting the goals that the City has for the project. <br />62 Un front: Risk can be minimized with the use of minimum assessment agreements and other <br />ss techniques as well, but because there is a financing component to this type of TIF financing, <br />64 there is more risk than with "pay as you go". In "up front" financing, the proposed project is <br />65 generally known at the time of financing commitment and therefore the City can negotiate <br />ss directly with end users to ensure the development is meeting the goals that the City has for the <br />67 project. <br />sa Public infrastructure funding: Another way to use TIF is by constructing infrastructure in order <br />ss to create an environment that is improved for development. This is particularly useful in <br />70 situations where the infrastructure is difficult to finance through assessments, such as due to <br />71 extraordinary technical difficulties or because the infrastructure is introducing important <br />72 amenities that are critical for becoming the catalyst for the new development, which is common <br />73 with streetscape and stormwater amenities. <br />74 Public infrastructure funding often occurs before the projects are proposed which can generate <br />75 some risks. Since the City has already invested prior to any development negotiations, the <br />76 investment may not assist in attracting the desired end users since the City would not have any <br />n input beyond regulatory controls in the end users. In addition, the redevelopment benefit can be <br />78 muted because the initial underlying property owners may absorb a lot of the infrastructure <br />79 benefits by raising land prices which doesn't assist the end users with any gap financing. <br />80 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />