Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />a <br />setbacks were moreover, <br />the maximum impervious coverage afforded the parcel. The Community <br />Development Staff has determined that the property can be made more <br />livable and can be put to a reasonable and practical use under the official <br />controls, if a 10 foot VARIANCE to Section 1004.02D4 is granted. <br /> <br />B. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not <br />created by the landowner: Corner lots are the most difficult to develop and <br />become very problematic when attempting to retrofit additions to homes or add <br />accessory structures. Specifically, the EXISTING CITY CODE requires these <br />lots have a 30 foot front yard, corner street side yard, and rear yard setback and a <br />lO foot interior side yard setback. When applied to existing lots, it becomes <br />evident that little area is available for cxpansion needs and desires. In the case of <br />the applicant's parcel, there is little distance separating the existing principal <br />structure and the required setbacks, which area limits the ability of the applicant. <br />Further, a detached accessory building would ruin the usable open space on the <br />parcel. The Community Development Staff has determined that the plight of <br />the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by <br />the landowner. <br /> <br />C. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: <br />The improvements proposed, a third stall garage, added on to and off-set from the <br />existing attached garage provide the applicant much needed living area that can <br />be designed to blend with the structure and not look out of character with home <br />constructed in the 1970's. The house directly to the south, at 373 Maple Court, <br />has a similar situation where the garage has been placed 20 feet from the property <br />line adjacent to Western Avenue. Further, adjacent property owners have been <br />apprised of the request by the applicant and they have indicated written support of <br />the proposed third garage stall and its encroachment into the required setback. <br />The Community Development Staff has determined that this variance, if <br />granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality, nor adversely <br />affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or adjacent <br />properties. <br /> <br />6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />6.l Based on the infol111ation provided and the findings in Section 5 of this project report, the <br />Community Development Staff recommends approval of an 10 foot VARIANCE to <br />Section 1004.02D4 (side yard adjacent a street) of the Roseville City Code for Diane <br />Holmgren and Rick Distad to allow the construction of a l2 foot, 4 inch by 24 foot <br />garage stall on to the west side of the existing attached garage to within 20 feet of the <br />Western Avenue property line, at 370 Millwood Street, subject to the following <br />conditions: <br /> <br />PF3545 - ReA 022304 - Page 4 of 6 <br />