Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />K. What are the most effective design guidelines for retail/office buffers, <br />landscaping, and screening of operations from mixed use residential areas? <br /> <br />L. What are the building design and materials and how do they adapt to the <br />retail area and surrounding residential areas? <br /> <br />M. What are the review, hearing, and permit processes used within the retail area <br />as it evolves over time and how effective are they? <br /> <br />N. What are the collaborative efforts and incentives used for better, more <br />flexible designs compatible with residential areas? <br /> <br />O. What models are there for continued working relationships with adjacent <br />residential areas? <br /> <br />P. What type of public space and infrastructure will be created based upon the <br />development and what is the impactlbenefits to the parks and public works <br />long term plans. <br /> <br />3.2 After review of these findings with the Planning Commission and City Council at public <br />meetings, additional findings by the Council and Planning Commission could be <br />incorporated into the moratorium justification report. <br /> <br />3.3 Based on the report and discussion with the Council on July 12th, the City Attorney and staff <br />have clarified the language of the proposed moratorium ordinance. A second reading was <br />held on July 26th. Specifically, the language now reads that the Master Plan, its applications, <br />plans, and permits are exempt from the moratorium - they are the reason for a moratorium. <br />August 9th is the suggested date for Council adoption. <br /> <br />4.0 SUGGESTED COUNCIL ACTION <br />DV\tl /<0:5 <br />4.1 kymotion, approve of the interim ordinance establishing moratorium on <br />building requests for the Twin Lakes area as identifie y the list of <br />attached map. <br /> <br /> <br />(Draft ordinance and Twin Lakes property owner list are attac <br /> <br />