My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03552
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3500
>
pf_03552
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:32:18 PM
Creation date
3/16/2006 9:07:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3552
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Project Name
Twin Lakes
Status
Active
Additional Information
Moratorium
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
874
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />From: ESANDS261 <br />Sent: Thursday, July 01,2004 1 :30 PM <br />To: dennis welsch@ci.roseville, mn. us <br />Cc: city.council@ci,roseville.mn,us; neaLbeets@ci.roseville,mn,us <br />Subject: TWIN lAKES MORATORIUM <br /> <br /> <br />Rottlund the new master developer, only has plans for the 70 acres located on the we$tside of Fairview. <br /> <br />Why should the moratorium be extended to the eCl$tside of Fairview all the way to Byerlys, when there are <br />no current proposals presented to develop this area? Any proposals beyond the 70 acre site Rottlund is <br />proposing is years away, and the one year moratorium is unnecessary and unfair to ownerSeCl$t of Fairview, in <br />my view. <br /> <br />It is my understanding that existing owners of those properties east of Fairview are grandfathered in to their <br />present use by the comprehensive plan of 2001 (office and residential). New owners, and or existing owners <br />who want to change the use from the esixting would have to be in compliance with the comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Either way, I consider it unfair to those east of Fairview to be included in a moratorium for the developer(s) with <br />the 70 acre proposal. I have no objection to a moratorium for the properties west of Fairview in the planned <br />Rottlund proposal AFTER Council has acted on a final amendment to the comprehensive plan AND approved the <br />Financial plan for the project on July 19. <br /> <br />Until then, we have no assurance the project will move forward, and it would simply be unfair to tie up existing <br />owners, <br /> <br />I don't think it's too much to ask that a decision on any moratorium be delayed until at least July 19, <br /> <br />5\{ Sands <br /> <br />8/4/2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.