Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />1. Developer contends area can use more retail and insufficient restaurants. <br />Read retail list. <br />Read the Rosedale list. <br />Read restaurant list. <br />Summarize retail and restaurants. <br /> <br />2. Twin Lakes Advisory Panel was stacked in favor of developers. <br /> <br />A. Mr. Shardlow claimed he was neutral, but showed clear favoritism to developer's <br />plan. <br />B. Developers submitted four plans that only rearranged retail and residential. <br />Developer concept plans were all prefaced by, these are only cmioons sketches <br />and need to be spec'd out, meaning the concept plans can be changed to developer <br />wishes later. <br /> <br />C. Both Mr. Shardlow and Mr. Johannson each give great sales pitches, but when <br />one digs into what has been said there is a lot of fluff. <br />Shardlow example: Claimed he was neutral, but talked negatively of Do Nothing <br />until office market improves. <br />Johannson example: Veritas employees want restaurants in walking distance. <br />- Previously Centre Pointe had two lots slotted for restaurants, which have <br />never been built. <br />- Veritas has a company cafeteria. <br />- I know for NCR co-workers at Veritas, none have mentioned that to me. <br />- I asked a former NCR worker point blank about the statement and he stated <br />that it was not true. <br /> <br />D. Developers never made their case for more retail. Mr. Johannson never presented <br />empirical data that supported his claims that Roseville can sustain additional retail <br />and restaurant development. <br /> <br />3. Traffic study presented at the final Twin Lakes Advisory Panel shows neighborhood <br />degradation. <br /> <br />Concept plan 1. <br />Current traffic on Fairview Avenue = 9500 <br />With development Fairview = 15600. <br /> <br />Percentage Increase = 15,600 - 9500 <br /> <br />64% <br /> <br />9,500 <br />