My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03552
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3500
>
pf_03552
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:32:18 PM
Creation date
3/16/2006 9:07:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3552
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Project Name
Twin Lakes
Status
Active
Additional Information
Moratorium
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
874
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Cleveland. <br />In addition, the is as for an estimated $47 mil lars <br />from the taxpayers in Roseville. How can the in <br />conscience even consider this? If the makes sense then <br />the developer should be bearing the ority of the cost of the <br />NOT THE TAXPAYERS. If a road is crucial for the then <br />should bear the estimated cost off $15-20 million to one- THE <br />TAXPAYERS. In addition, stat that an a Costco can <br />make this needs more than just the stat it. from <br />this of If wil be immense to this area and more than the <br />health should be considered by the <br />personnel. To see that residents who will be this <br />less consideration than a developer is a sad commentary on the motives of our elected <br />officials. is the financial health of a developer considered y than the <br />preservation of a wonderful neighborhood and park area? is the financial health of a <br />developer considered higher priority than out for the Roseville taxpayers and <br />spending their money wisely. development that asks for $47 million dollars from <br />Roseville and a parkway is not a good investment for the Roseville taxpayers and should be <br />turned down. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Thank you for your time, <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.