Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Cleveland. <br />In addition, the is as for an estimated $47 mil lars <br />from the taxpayers in Roseville. How can the in <br />conscience even consider this? If the makes sense then <br />the developer should be bearing the ority of the cost of the <br />NOT THE TAXPAYERS. If a road is crucial for the then <br />should bear the estimated cost off $15-20 million to one- THE <br />TAXPAYERS. In addition, stat that an a Costco can <br />make this needs more than just the stat it. from <br />this of If wil be immense to this area and more than the <br />health should be considered by the <br />personnel. To see that residents who will be this <br />less consideration than a developer is a sad commentary on the motives of our elected <br />officials. is the financial health of a developer considered y than the <br />preservation of a wonderful neighborhood and park area? is the financial health of a <br />developer considered higher priority than out for the Roseville taxpayers and <br />spending their money wisely. development that asks for $47 million dollars from <br />Roseville and a parkway is not a good investment for the Roseville taxpayers and should be <br />turned down. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Thank you for your time, <br /> <br />2 <br />