Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Sent: <br />To: <br /> <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Talbot, Rick <br />RE: PF3557 _Section 407.02G Revisions(032904)-1 st Reading <br /> <br />1. doesn't the ordinance have to show all the proposed changes -- deletions from the current ord. as well as proposed <br />additions? If I'm reading this correctly, your attached ord. shows some additional clarifying language but doesn't show the <br />proposed deletions. <br /> <br />2. we will be asked "what other communities have done on this issue" so we might as well do a survey of at least our <br />neighboring communities, esp. little canada, re their regulations of "farm animals" and "poultry." <br /> <br />3. similarly, we may be asked whether this would affect any current roseville resident and, if so, how. Please address that <br /> <br />Otherwise, sounds like a useful clarification. <br /> <br />N. <br /> <br />--mOriginal Messagem-- <br />From: Welsch, Dennis <br />Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 1:57 PM <br />To: Beets, Neal; 'jts@ratwiklaw.com'; Paschke, Thomas; Munson, Don; Mathwig, Rick; Talbot, Rick <br />Subject: PF3557 _Section 407.02G Revisions(032904)-lst Reading <br /> <br /><< File: PF3557 _Section 407.02G Revisions(032904)-lst Reading.doc >> <br />From time to time we have had questions or complaints about the raising of farm animals in the <br />community. Our staff has had difficulty interpreting the current code, Section 407.02G. I propose the <br />following change to the one paragraph section which would prohibit keeping or raising for food farm <br />animals, poultry, and bees within the city. Do you have any concerns or comments? I will ask that this <br />amendment (with any changes) be placed on the agenda for March 29th for a first reading (named <br />aptly to get a first reaction from the Council). <br /> <br />1 <br />