pf_03571 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

c. The applicant must record the two lot minor subdivision within 60 days after the approval of the City Council. 7.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 7.1 On Wednesday, June 2, 2004 the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Trudeau request. At the hearing, one citizen addressed the Commission asking a number of questions regarding the size of the two parcels and the required setbacks. The Commission received four written responses (attached) objecting to the proposal. 7.2 The Planning Commission indicated concerns over supporting the creation of two substandard residential parcels and that the lot design and subsequent home would be out of character with the neighborhood. 7.3 The Planning Commission voted (4-0) to recommend DENIAL of the request because the Commission concluded that there was no hardship present to support a Code deviation; the proposal creates two substandard residential parcels; the proposed lots would be out of character with the neighborhood; and the vacant parcel would have limited area for a house footprint that may require future variances. 8.0 SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 8.1 ADOPT A RESOLUTION DENYING THE VARIANCE AND MINOR SUBDIVISION request Edward Trudeau on the basis that: a. No hardship can be concluded to necessitate the granting of a variance. b. The proposed parcel design creates two substandard residential parcels. c. The proposed design is out of character with other parcels directly adjacent to the subject site. d. The proposed design, due to its limited area for a house footprint, may require future variances. Prepared by: Thomas Paschke (792-7074) Attachments: Property location map, aerial photo of parcel, lot division survey, narrative, and draft resolution PF3571 ReA 061404 Page 5 of5