Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />a <br />to a <br /> <br />to <br /> <br /> <br />a <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Mr. <br /> <br />Section 12.02B3 (Required Yards & Open Space Side or Rear <br />fences not to exceed 6-1/2 feet in height. <br /> <br />Only) <br /> <br />4.3 The proposal by Mr. Thienes seeks to fence an area 24 feet by 32 feet, which area <br />generally occupies the southwest comer of the parcel. <br /> <br />5.0 STAFF COMMENTS/FINDINGS: <br /> <br />5.1 The original structure (house) was built in 1948 and lies generally in the southwest comer <br />of the parcel. The parcel is rectangular with a length of 154 feet adjacent to McCarrons <br />Boulevard South and a depth of approximately 85 feet. <br /> <br />5.2 The land in this area (Roma Avenue to McCarrons Boulevard) generally slopes from the <br />southwest to the northeast, which in the case of the subject parcel, creates an elevation <br />change of approximately four feet from the rear of the home at 267 Roma Street down to <br />the rear of the Thienes home. <br /> <br />5.3 The City Planner has reviewed this situation and determined there is justification for <br />granting a VARIANCE to Section 1012.02B3 of the Roseville City Code to Mr. Thienes. <br /> <br />5.4 In Section 1013 the Code states ..... Where there are practical difficulties or unusual <br />hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, <br />the Variance Board shall have the power, in a specific case and after notice and <br />public hearings, to vary any such provision in harmony with the general purpose <br />and intent thereof and may impose such additional conditions as it considers <br />necessary so that the public health, safety, and general welfare may be secured and <br />substantial justice done, <br /> <br />5.5 State Statute 462.357, subd. 6 (2) provides authority for the city to "hear requests <br />for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their <br />strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to <br />the individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when <br />it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of <br />the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a <br />variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used <br />under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due <br />to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the <br />variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality, Economic <br />considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the <br />property exists under the terms of the ordinance....The board or governing body as <br /> <br />PF3593_RVBA_090104.doc - Page 2 of4 <br />