Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Issue <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />was not <br /> <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />before cremation was <br /> <br /> <br />,,25 <br /> <br /> <br />denied Applicant the conditional use permit. <br /> <br /> <br />facts <br /> <br />vided mostly by the hearing participants associated with the applicant, and written <br /> <br />materials provided by the applicant, the Council made certain findings. Among its <br /> <br />findings, were the following: <br /> <br />(3) The proposed use will emit "criteria" pollutants and "toxic" pollut- <br />ants. (Source: Materials submitted by applicant, All Crematory, <br />Anne Jackson, et aL) <br /> <br />(4) Emission of these toxic materials is not practically avoidable or <br />controllable under current cremation processes. (Source: Environ- <br />mental information from Industrial Equipment and Engineering Co., <br />6/21/2001). <br /> <br />(5) The emission of mercury, hydrogen chloride, and other pollutants <br />from the proposed crematory adds to the risk of exposure to these <br />public health dangers for the residents, businesses and users of pub- <br />facilities in <br /> <br /> <br />Currently, the cremation rate in the United States is approximately <br />24%. Within the next 10 years it is anticipated that the demand for <br />cremation services wIll increase nearlv 700/'0. (Source: Letter of Ernv <br />~ - ~ <br /> <br />Czirok dated June 29, 2001). <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />0' <br />--' !d. <br />2.. A-239; See generall,v R-I-143; A-14-167. <br />25 A-239 (emphasis in original!. <br />26 See Findings below. <br /> <br />-+ <br />