Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />were <br /> <br /> <br />not <br /> <br />its <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br /> <br />not appeal <br /> <br /> <br />of <br /> <br /> <br />'s . <br /> <br /> <br />OF ARGUlVIENT <br /> <br />Far from being unreasonable in its denial of the conditional use permit, the <br /> <br />City would have been arbitrary and capricious if it had approved the crematorium <br /> <br />use. Many unanswered questions remain as to the risks of the proposed incinera- <br /> <br />tions in a residential area. The actual number of corpses to be incinerated per day <br /> <br />and the resulting amount of pollution are not specified in the application and are, <br /> <br />therefore, unlimited. And even if the amounts of well known pollutants are below <br /> <br />regulatory maximums, what will be the cumulative effect from all sources? As <br /> <br />protector of the region's health, the City was forced to deny the permit. <br /> <br />The Environmental Protection Agency, with all its resources and expertise, <br /> <br /> <br />to issue guidelines <br /> <br /> <br />not do so until 2005, <br /> <br />can the <br /> <br />City of Roseville, with inexact information, be expected to determine safe levels? <br /> <br />2<) A-787 <br />.. - I. <br /> <br />See A-288: R-151-156. <br />C', See R-157-169. <br /> <br />6 <br />