Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />a crematonum in <br /> <br />a <br /> <br /> <br />47 <br /> <br />issue the <br /> <br /> <br />not been <br /> <br /> <br />case at <br /> <br /> <br />was not con- <br /> <br /> <br />the <br /> <br /> <br />to be met <br /> <br /> <br />C. meeting its burden to show that there would be no negative im- <br />pact on public health, Applicant left the City with great uncertainty and <br />doubt. <br /> <br />The record on which the City made its decision provides many instances in <br /> <br />which Applicant was unable to demonstrate that its proposed use was safe. The <br /> <br />uncertainties engendered by these failures fall into two categories: 1) operational <br /> <br />uncertainty; and 2) scientific uncertainties. <br /> <br />The operational uncertainties in Applicant's application complicate the sci- <br /> <br />entitlc questions that need to be answered. Applicant did not propose any limit on <br /> <br />the number of corpses that would be incinerated each day.48 Thus, it is impossible. <br /> <br />even still, to determine the level of emissions from such burning. Since there was <br /> <br />no <br /> <br /> <br />an <br /> <br />it was <br /> <br /> <br />the City to even beein to fashion reasonable, realistic maxima on its O\vn. This <br />.;....../ , <br /> <br />quantitative indeterminacy is particularly troubling given the statements about the <br /> <br />rapid acceleration in the use of cremation in America and Minnesota. 49 <br /> <br />';6 Id. at 73. <br />';7 Butler. 160 N.C. App. at 73. <br />';x "_7T'''_;/4/'R_19 <br />4'\. __-' __.. 10. <br /> <br />.;<) A-123; R-27. <br />