My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03600
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3600
>
pf_03600
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:36:53 PM
Creation date
6/2/2006 8:30:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3600
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Project Name
Roselawn Cemetery
Status
Non-Active
Additional Information
MN Court of Appeals
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />means <br /> <br /> <br />In <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />D. clearing and providing useful <br />plicant's experts introduced new uncertainties and were unqualified to <br />on many of the issues. <br /> <br />The uncertainties about the crematorium were not cleared up <br /> <br />expert <br /> <br />ions. Contrary to Applicant's assertions,68 the City of Roseville \vas under no ob- <br /> <br />ligation to allow its decision to be controlled by the limited and non-conclusive <br /> <br />opinions expressed by the engineers Jackson and Hannu. Indeed, the case cited <br /> <br />Applicant, Sup"erArnerica Grp. v. Ci(v of Little Canada, stands for the opposite <br /> <br />idea. \Vhat SuperAmerica does say is that <br /> <br /> <br />a <br /> <br />may not ect expert <br /> <br />testimony without adequate supporting reasons, those reasons need not be based <br /> <br />on expert testimony.,,69 And the wisdom of following the guidance of these "ex- <br /> <br /> <br />IS even <br /> <br /> <br />nor <br /> <br />are <br /> <br />health experts, as they readily admit and as the district court pointed out in <br /> <br />memorandum accompanying its decision.io <br /> <br />6i See supra. note 34 and accompanying text. <br />Appellant's Brief, 15. <br />09 539 N.\V.2d 264,267 (Minn. App. 1995); See a/so BBY [nveSlOrs v. City <br />,\fap/e,,\'ood, 467 N.\V.2d 63 L 635 (Minn. App. 1991). <br />A-282-285. <br /> <br />, ..., <br />i J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.