Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />an <br /> <br />zone. Since <br /> <br /> <br />IS <br /> <br /> <br />a <br /> <br /> <br />re- <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />zonmg must <br /> <br /> <br />on <br /> <br /> <br />Street <br /> <br />rights as <br /> <br />Once again, the standard of review in this case does not require the court to <br /> <br />agree with the Council's decision. All that is necessary is that the decision have a <br />~ . <br /> <br />rational basis.s3 Considering that the caution shown by the City is standard proce- <br /> <br />dure in public health matters, the approval sought for the crematorium would itself <br /> <br />have been the irrational decision, hence reversible by thIS court. The choice the <br /> <br />City did make-to protect the health, safety and peace of mind of the families and <br /> <br />children living on Alameda Street and throughout the neighborhood-was un- <br />~ ~ ~ <br /> <br />questionably reasonable. <br /> <br />II. Because Applicant's proposal is inadequate and the project is fraught <br />with uncertainty, this court should affirm the trial court's dismissal of <br />this lawsuit. The only alternative would be remand. <br /> <br />Applicant proposed placing a facility that incinerates human remains in a <br /> <br />residential neighborhood.s4 As part of the official approval process, it had an obli- <br /> <br />gation to show that this facility would not harm the public health.85 \Vhen the C <br /> <br />83 Swanson, 421 N.\V.2d at 311; White Bear Docking, 324 N.\V.2d at 176; Honn v, <br />efl)' of Coon Rapids, 313 N.\V.2d at 417. <br />~4\ _ jj~_77j! <br />,"\. --- --..,.. <br /> <br />85"'1' S' \.t'j'-9-S 'd 1 R .'11 C' Z . Od" 101'01D <br />LV mn. tat. '::i ..,.6.......)) ). UD ..: osen e Ity onmg r mance ~ .)... <br /> <br />........, <br />