My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03600
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3600
>
pf_03600
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:36:53 PM
Creation date
6/2/2006 8:30:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3600
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Project Name
Roselawn Cemetery
Status
Non-Active
Additional Information
MN Court of Appeals
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />8. <br />32 per day (Source: fax from Timothy 1. Koch dated 7/23/01). <br /> <br />For 2000, the statewide cremation percentage was 30.30 % or about <br /> <br />9. <br />location, and operating procedures have not yet been promulgated to adequately <br /> <br />Updated Federal and state standards regarding crematory emissions, <br /> <br />address the growing use of cremation, nor developments in medical science such <br />as brachytherapy that that could introduce an additional environmental health <br />threat, in spite of the 1990 Federal Clean Air Act amendments that require the <br />Environmental Protection Agency to develop new source perfonnance standards <br />and emission guidelines for crematories. <br /> <br />10. The required emISSIOn limits for acid gases (sulfur dioxide and <br /> <br />hydrogen chloride), patiiculate matter, opacity, metals (including cadmium, lead <br /> <br />and .. . ide and nitrogen . <br />mercury), orgamcs (dIOxms and furans), carbon monox oXIdes <br />from crematories have not been established in part due to limited inforrnation <br /> <br />available to environmental protection agencies (Source lEE Co.! All Crematory). <br /> <br />Roselawn filed a declaratory judgment action in district court seeking judgment requiring <br /> <br />city to issue it a conditional use permit and damages. The city moved for summary <br /> <br />judgment on the grounds that it acted reasonably in denying Roselawn's request and the city was <br /> <br />immune from the damage claim. Shortly thereafter, Roselawn moved for summary judgment on <br /> <br />its behalf. The district court granted summary judgment to the city. <br /> <br />ISSUE <br /> <br />Was the city's decision to deny Roselawn a conditional use perrnit arbitrary, capricious, <br /> <br />or unreasonable? <br /> <br />ANAL YSIS <br /> <br />http://www.courts.state.mn.us/opinions/coa/current/opa040672-1123.htm <br /> <br />11/23/2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.