My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03600
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3600
>
pf_03600
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:36:53 PM
Creation date
6/2/2006 8:30:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3600
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Project Name
Roselawn Cemetery
Status
Non-Active
Additional Information
MN Court of Appeals
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Minn. Stat. 9462.3595, subd. 1 (emphasis added). This language unambiguously places the <br /> <br />burden on the applicant to prove the proposed use will conforrn to a city's stated standards and <br /> <br />criteria for the issuance of a conditional use perrnit. See Mut. Servo Cas. Ins. Co. v. League oj <br /> <br />Minn. Cities Ins. Trust, 659 N.W.2d 755, 760 (Minn. 2003) (stating "where the intention of the <br /> <br />legislature is clearly manifested by plain and unambiguous language, [appellate comis] have <br /> <br />neither the need nor the pem1ission to engage in statutory interpretation"). <br /> <br />Under the city's zoning ordinances, the city council shall consider the following criteria <br /> <br />when reviewing an application for a conditional use perrnit: <br /> <br />1. Impact on traffic. <br />2. Impact on parks, streets and other public facilities. <br />3. Compatibility of the site plan, intemal traffic circulation, landscaping and <br />structures with contiguous properties. <br />4. Impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties. <br />5. Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare. <br />6. Compatibility with the city's comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Roseville, Minn., City Code 9 1013.01 (D) (2001). Here, the city council detem1ined: <br />As submitted by the applicant, the proposed use would negatively affect the <br />character of the neighborhood due to the nature of the proposed use, the intensity <br />of the proposed use, the proximity of residential propeIiies, natural resources, and <br />public facilities abutting or in close proximity to the subject parcel and the <br />inability to fashion practical teIms and conditions for the proposed use to protect <br />the general health, safety and public welfare of the neighborhood and community. <br /> <br />It' II ttl d th t t t' f general bl' health, safety and welfare . l'd <br />IS we se e a pro ec IOn 0 pu IC IS a va 1 <br />basis to deny a conditional use pem1it. See SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. City of Little Canada, <br /> <br />539 N.W.2d 264, 267 (Minn. App. 1995) (stating "city council may deny a conditional use <br /> <br />perrnit only for reasons relating to the public health, safety, and general welfare or for <br /> <br />http://www.courts.state.mn.us/opinions/coa/current/opa040672-1123.htm <br /> <br />11/23/2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.