Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />RE: RV PARKING <br /> <br />Schroeder: <br /> <br />Non-trailer vs RV motorized <br /> <br />1. Licensed <br />2. Owned by property owners <br />3. Owners vs neighbors view <br />4. Owners cannot get to back yard <br /> <br />Ihlan: Treat RV and 5th Wheel/Trailer the same, yet some don't want these in <br />front yard. Boats may be exception. <br /> <br />Kough: American dream, need time to bring home and clean up. Bloomington and <br />Eagan tried to do this - real problems. Keep them in front. <br /> <br />Schroeder: Enforcement issue. <br /> <br />Carol K.: Concem about restricting the homeowners. She lives in the "rural" area. <br />Placing restrictions is not right. <br /> <br />Kysylyczyn: Paved surface for parking. What is "improved surface" - concrete or <br />gravel or crushed rock. Should there be something for penl1eable surface <br />too - dustless, weed free, erosion proof, compacted. <br /> <br />Klausing: Change will result in more vehicles in front of houses. This is not <br />inconsistent. Towing the vehicle <br /> <br />Carol K: Driveways on side ifroom; cannot fit with five foot setback. Will cars <br />have same provision. <br /> <br />\\metro-inet.us\Roseville\CommDev\PLANNING _AND _ ZONING\PLANNING _FILES\3600-3649\36 I 2_ R V Parking\Notes liom <br />111504 Council Mtg.doc <br />