Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MEETING SEIJTEMB <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />CITY OF <br />FRIDLEY <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />September 1 2001 <br /> <br />(7 <br />A\~ <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />William Burns, City Manager <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Scott Hickok; Community Development Director <br />Paul Bolin, Planning Coordinator <br />Stacy Bulthuis, Planner <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Public Hearing to reconsider Recreational Vehicle Parking <br /> <br />M-01-132 <br /> <br />In preparation for the public hearing on recreational vehicle parking, staff conducted a <br />survey of the surrounding cities to determine what their ordinances state regarding <br />recreational vehicle parking. The attached matrix shows our findings. <br /> <br />COUNCIL/COMMISSION SURVEY RESULTS <br />The results from the 2000 Council/Commission survey showed that the Council members <br />were divided between all the cptions. Two Council members would allow non-motorized <br />trailers to be parked in the front yard as long as they were parked on a hard surtace. One <br />Council member chose the "do nothing" option. The fourth Council member chose the <br />option that would continue to consider the parking of non-motorized camper and trailers <br />through the variance process. We would, however, establish a practice of allowing them if <br />the person had no access to his side or rear yard and there are no complaints for <br />adjoining neighbors. The fifth Council member was undecided on this issue. <br /> <br />The results from the Commission members showed that a majority would keep the <br />ordinance the same and/or make it more restrictive. Twenty of the forty-one <br />commissioners selected the option that would continue to prohibit non-motorized campers <br />and trailer from the front yard and would also pass a new ordinance barring motorized <br />campers and trailers from the front yard. Eleven of the commissioners chose the option <br />that would continue to consider the parking of non-motorized campers and trailers through <br />the variance process. We would, however, establish a practice of allowing them if the <br />person had no accesS to his side or rear yard and there are no complaints for adjoining <br />neighbors. Eight of the commissioners chose the "do nothing" option and two <br />commissioners chose the option that would allow non-motorized trailers to be parked in <br />the front yard as long as they were placed on a hard suriaCi8. <br /> <br />31 <br /> <br />[1:/[0' d <br /> <br />",31GI C:l::l ::lO M IJ <br /> <br />9p:~1 v002-~0-~ON <br />