Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />These <br /> <br />apply to all <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />It goes on to state: <br /> <br /> <br />Again, the ordinance specifically states that this applies to the shoreland district not the <br />shoreland management district. Therefore, the restriction on the density of the PUD within 1,000 <br />of the ordinary high water mark must meet the requirement of at least 50% of the area will be <br />preserved as open space. <br /> <br />The 50% requirement applies to the PUD since it applies to the project area and therefore does <br />not include any area that is not part of the PUD such as Langton Lake Park. <br /> <br />I have included a rough map of the 1,000 foot area superimposed on the development as an <br />attachment. It covers a significantly larger portion of the proposed PUD than indicated on the <br />map from the city staff. <br /> <br />The concern that the plan for this redevelopment did not meet the requirements of the Roseville <br />Shoreland Ordinance was first expressed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources in <br />their review of the AUAR submitted in 2001. (Note: these comments were included in the <br /> <br /> <br />(From response from: <br />Thomas W. Balcom, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, June 13,2001:) <br /> <br /> <br />They went on to say: <br /> <br /> <br />