My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03624
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3600
>
pf_03624
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:39:09 PM
Creation date
6/7/2006 9:39:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3624
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
1935 LAKE ST
Applicant
Jeff Brown
Status
Approved
PIN
012923210011
Date Final Variance Board Action
3/2/2005
Planning Files - Resolution #
13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />on <br />enactment shoreland (March 1974) that do not <br />meet the requirements of this Chapter may be allowed as building sites <br />without variances from lot size requirements provided; the use is permitted <br />in the zoning district; all sanitary requirements of the City Code are <br />complied with insofar as practical; and the minimum lot size and length of <br />water frontage shall be not less than seventy percent (70%) of standard lot <br />water frontage requirements; the lot has been in separate ownership from <br />abutting lands since the original adoption of the City shoreland controls <br />(March 27, 197 4). <br /> <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />A variance from setback requirements shall be obtained before any use or <br />building permit is issued for a lot. In evaluating the variance, the Board of <br />Adjustment (Varianee Board) shall consider, in addition to the <br />requirements of Section 1016.20, public utilities available to the lot and <br />shall deny the variance if adequate facilities cannot be provided. <br /> <br />5.2 The original plat, Garcelons Addition to Saint Paul was recorded with Ramsey County on <br />June 9,1888, which subdivision created lots 50 feet in width and 126 feet in depth. Since <br />that date, a number of the 50 foot wide lots or pOliions thereof have been combined with <br />adjacent lots. <br /> <br />5.3 On July 13, 1978, Joann & Allen Mattson received approval for a division oflot, which <br />in essence, combined the north 28 feet of Lot 10 to Lot 9, creating a parcel 78 feet in <br />width, 126 feet in depth, and being 9,828 sq. ft in size. <br /> <br />5.4 Notwithstanding the variance approval of 1998, this parcel, although achieving 70% <br />compliance with 1016.22, the 9,828 sq. ft. area does not attain the 70% compliance <br />(65.5%), nor does the proposed structure meet 70% of the required 75 foot (52.5 feet <br />required) shoreland setback (36 feet proposed). Given the language in the Code, it is <br />difficult for the City Planner to conclude (interpret) conformity with Section 1016.24. <br />Hence, the City Planner has determined that it is prudent, and in the best interest of the <br />City and applicant/property owner, to proceed through and reeeive all applicable <br />variances, so that issues regarding non-conformity do not arise in the future. <br /> <br />5.5 Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements Front & Side Yard Setbacks) <br />requires this property to have a minimum front yard setback of 30 feet. The proposal <br />indicates a front yard setback of21 feet (an encroachment of9 feet), similar to that of <br />adjacent homes on the street. Section 1004.016 also requires a side yard setback of either <br />5 feet or 10 feet depending on the age of the platted lot. Because of the lot combination <br />in 1998, staff required the "new parcel" to have 10 foot side yard setbacks. The proposal <br />indicates a 7 foot side yard setback on the south (a 3 foot encroachment) and a 5 foot side <br />yard setback on the north (a 5 foot encroachment). <br /> <br />PF3624_RVBA_030205.doc- Page 3 of8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.