My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03625
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3600
>
pf_03625
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:39:34 PM
Creation date
6/12/2006 9:52:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3625
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Status
Non-Active
Additional Information
Park dedication fees
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />~ fu~ ~ <br />cover a of costs. The cost per unit be reduced to <br />account for the likelihood that some growth-related park costs can be paid for with Federal <br />and State grants. Over the last five years, the City has received an average of $126,000 <br />annually in grants for park improvements, as summarized in Table 30. <br />Conway\Road and Park Impact Fee Study Aprii 15,2003 DR2\FT, Page 26 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Table 30 <br />PARK GRANT FUNDING, 1998-2002 <br />Grant Date Description Amount <br />Arkansas Dept. of Parks and Tourism 1998 Fishing Pier at Beaverfork Park $50,000 <br />Federal Highway Enhancement Fund 1998 Bike Trail at Tucker Creek Park $200,000 <br />A&P Commission 2000 Don Owen Sports Center $155,727 <br />A&P Commission 2002 New Bike Trail at Tucker Creel Park $22,000 <br />Federal Highway Enhancement Fund 2002 New Bike Trail at Tucker Creek Park $200,000 <br />Total Grant Funding 1998-2002 $627,727 <br />Average Annual Grant Funding $126,000 <br />Source: Conway Parks and Recreation Department, December 2002. <br /> <br />It is reasonable to assume that the grant funding received per park service unit in the past <br />will continue in the future. Dividing the average annual grant funding by existing service units <br />yields annual funding per service unit. Multiplying that by the present value factor results in <br />the current lump sum amount that is the equivalent of the future stream of outside funding <br />the City will receive over the next 20 years to help fund park improvements. Based on these <br />assumptions, the appropriate credit for potential grant funding for parks is $93 for each new <br />single-family home, or park service unit equivalent, as shown in Table 31. <br /> <br />Table 31 <br />PARK GRANT FUNDING CREDIT <br />Average Annual Grant Funding $126,000 <br />Existing Park EDUs, 2003 17,239 <br />Annual Funding per EDU $7.31 <br />Present Value Factor (20 years @ 4.7%) 12.79 <br />Grant Funding Credit per EDU $93 <br />Source: Average annual grant funding from Table 30; existing <br />park EDUs from Table 24; discount rate for present value factor <br />from Table 11. <br /> <br />Reducing the cost per service unit by the debt credit and the anticipated grant funding per <br />service unit leaves a net cost of $639 per EDU to maintain the existing level of service. <br /> <br />Table 32 <br />PARK NET COST PER SERVICE UNIT <br />Cost per EDU $883 <br />Debt Credit per EDU $151 <br />Grant Funding Credit per EDU $93 <br />Net Cost per EDU $639 <br />Source: Cost per EDU from Table 28; debt credit per EDU from Table 29; grant funding <br />credit per EDU from Table 31. <br />Conway\Road and Park Impact Fee Study April 15, 2003 DRAFT, Page 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.