Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Table 33 <br />P ARK NET COST PER DWELLING UNIT <br />Housing Type <br />EDUs! <br />Unit <br />Net Cost! <br />EDU <br />Net Cost! <br />Unit <br /> <br />1 29 <br />3-Bedroom, 1,688 sq. <br />Single-Family, 2,684 <br />Single-Family,5-Bedroom, sq. <br />Ai] Detached Units 1 <br />Multi-Family 0.7056395447 <br />Mobile Home 0.87 5639 5556 <br />Source: EDUs per unit lI0111 Table 22; net cost per EDU from Table 32. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />avg. 1.20 <br />avg 128 5639 5818 <br />56395639 <br /> <br />As with the road impact fees, the park net cost schedule would allow several altemative ways of <br />charging single-family detached units: all single-family units could be charged the same <br />the single-family average shown in the fee schedule; (2) the fees could vary the size of the <br />unit. This last altemative is described more fully below, New development could be assessed on the <br />basis of unit size in several ways, One way would be to create size categories that cOlTespond to the <br />number of bedrooms using the midpoints between the averages, A problem with this approach is that <br />as you cross the size threshold between a two-bedroom and a three bedroom unit, for example, the fee <br />would go up by almost $200 for adding one additional square foot (see Figure 13). <br />3The equation is y 250 * Ln(x) 1,225, where y is the maximum impact fee for the dwelling unit and x is the floor area of the unit <br />square <br />feet; the R2 is 0.930, the adjusted R2 is 0.896 and the T-statistics are -3.3 for the intercept and 5.2 for the coefficient. <br />COllway\Road and Park Impact Fee 5tudy April! 5, 2003 DRAFT, Page 28 <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 14 <br />P ARK FEES BY UNIT SIZE <br />To avoid these kinds of threshold effects, park impact fees for single-family units could be assessed <br />using a sliding scale, Regression analysis was used to detemline the curve that best fits the four data <br />points (shown as squares in Figure 14), The resulting semi-logarithmic equation (shown as the dashed <br />line in Figure 14) explains 93 percent of the variance.3 The graphed relationship corresponds with <br />common sense, which suggests that the number of residents per square foot will begin to taper off <br />with very large units, While pemlit clerks cannot be expected to calculate fees at the counter using a <br />logarithmic equation, it is a simple matter to develop a fee schedule using 100 square foot or other <br />intervals, of such a schedule 250 and 500 square foot intervals is shown in Table 34 <br />below, <br /> <br />Table 34 <br />SAMPLE VARIABLE PARK FEE SCHEDULE <br />Dwelling Sq. Ft, Fee <br />750 - I ,000 5469 <br />1,001 - 1,250 5531 <br />1,251 - 1,500 5582 <br />1,50 I - 1.750 5623 <br />1,751 2,0005659 <br />2,001 2,2505690 <br />2,251 - 2,500 5718 <br />2,501 - 3,000 5755 <br />3,001 - 3,5005797 <br />3,501 4,000 5832 <br />