My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03625
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3600
>
pf_03625
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:39:34 PM
Creation date
6/12/2006 9:52:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3625
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Status
Non-Active
Additional Information
Park dedication fees
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />3J Forecast annual <br /> <br />revenues <br /> <br /> <br />the residential <br /> <br />4 J Compare new costs to new revenues over a selected time horizon. If costs <br />exceed revenues, the development will generate a deficit (loss), If revenues <br />exceed costs, the development will generate a surplus. <br /> <br />The current combines the case multiplier method of fiscal <br />described Burchell et a1. The case study method relies on detailed site- <br />interviews of officials combined with intensive review of <br />information and department expenses to estimate the impacts of proposed development on public <br />revenues and costs. The case study method assumes that capacity constraints and other factors <br />will cause certain departments of community government to incur different relative cost <br />increases as a result of residential development. The fiscal multiplier approach assumes a fixed- <br />multiplier impact on department expenses, based on the percentage increase in population or <br />housing units, Each method is most appropriate for specific types of community expenses and <br />departments, depending on the characteristics of the community and of the specific expense(s) <br />considered. <br /> <br />Modeling the Perry Farm Subdivision' A Build-Out <br />A fOlTIlal build-out analysis of Perry Farnl indicates that the property would support a 49-house <br />subdivision of typical three-bedroom houses. This analysis accounts for the current zoning <br />classification of the Perry property, the size of the parcel, the placement of roads and <br />infrastructure, and wetland restrictions which would prevent building on certain parts of the <br />property, The characteristics of new housing units, and thus the assessed value of these units, is <br />modeled after recent subdivisions in Middletown. <br /> <br />Changes in Public <br />New housing units require town services, including police and fire protection, public schooling <br />for children and other government services. Case study interviews andlor budget assessments <br />were combined with fiscal multiplier methods to assess the resulting costs imposed on the <br />Middletown school department, fire department, police department, public works department, <br />sewer and water department, town support services and capital improvement budget. Together, <br />these departments represent approximately 85 percent of all Middletown government expenses. <br />New costs imposed on other departments, including the town clerk, town administrator, town <br />planner and tax assessor, are estimated using fiscal multiplier methods and fall back ratios, as <br />described in Appendix One. <br /> <br />Assessing Changes in Public Revenues <br />Changes in tax revenues are estimated based on the build-out analysis of the PelTY Farm property <br />(Hingorany 1998), combined with an analysis of tax revenues generated by recent Middletown <br />subdivisions, Impact fees are estimated at $350 per housing unit. Other revenue impacts are <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.