My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03625
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3600
>
pf_03625
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:39:34 PM
Creation date
6/12/2006 9:52:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3625
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Status
Non-Active
Additional Information
Park dedication fees
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1.2 Summary of Recommendations <br />Based on the findings presented in the Study, the following recommendations are presented: <br /> <br />1. The County should establish new park fees to fairly allocate the costs of new parkland <br />acquisition and development to new residential development. The following park fees <br />for the County are recommended: <br /> <br />Table 1- Recommended Park Fees <br /> <br />Total Park Fees per Dwelling Unit <br /> <br />Categories <br /> <br />West I Central Contra <br />Costa County <br /> <br />East Contra <br />Costa County <br /> <br />Single-Family Attached <br />T ownhomes <br />Multi-f amily Unit <br />Mobile Home <br />Second Units <br /> <br />$6.788 <br />$5.399 <br />$4.889 <br />$4.551 <br />$2.268 <br /> <br />$5,441 <br />$4.328 <br />$3.919 <br />$3.653 <br />$1.818 <br /> <br />2. Since different residential land uses (or housing types) have significantly varying <br />household sizes, this Study recommends a new fee structure that allocates per capita <br />costs to four housing types and second units. The recommended housing types are <br />detached single-family homes, attached single-family homes (or townhomes), multi- <br />family residences and mobile homes. The calculation of the average household size <br />for the four housing types and second units, based upon 2000 U ,S. Census <br />information, are shown and further discussed in Section 3. <br /> <br />3. The County should establish a new parks and trails master planning fee to recover the <br />costs of preparing and updating a park master plan as enabled by passage of AB <br />2936. Based on cost estimates provided by the County, the recommended fee <br />structure for the parks and trails master planning fee is presented in the table on the <br />following page and further discussed in Section 4. <br /> <br />Park Impact Fee Nexus Study, 2004 <br />County of Contra Costa <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />DRAFT REPORT <br /> <br />6-11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.