Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1.2 Summary of Recommendations <br />Based on the findings presented in the Study, the following recommendations are presented: <br /> <br />1. The County should establish new park fees to fairly allocate the costs of new parkland <br />acquisition and development to new residential development. The following park fees <br />for the County are recommended: <br /> <br />Table 1- Recommended Park Fees <br /> <br />Total Park Fees per Dwelling Unit <br /> <br />Categories <br /> <br />West I Central Contra <br />Costa County <br /> <br />East Contra <br />Costa County <br /> <br />Single-Family Attached <br />T ownhomes <br />Multi-f amily Unit <br />Mobile Home <br />Second Units <br /> <br />$6.788 <br />$5.399 <br />$4.889 <br />$4.551 <br />$2.268 <br /> <br />$5,441 <br />$4.328 <br />$3.919 <br />$3.653 <br />$1.818 <br /> <br />2. Since different residential land uses (or housing types) have significantly varying <br />household sizes, this Study recommends a new fee structure that allocates per capita <br />costs to four housing types and second units. The recommended housing types are <br />detached single-family homes, attached single-family homes (or townhomes), multi- <br />family residences and mobile homes. The calculation of the average household size <br />for the four housing types and second units, based upon 2000 U ,S. Census <br />information, are shown and further discussed in Section 3. <br /> <br />3. The County should establish a new parks and trails master planning fee to recover the <br />costs of preparing and updating a park master plan as enabled by passage of AB <br />2936. Based on cost estimates provided by the County, the recommended fee <br />structure for the parks and trails master planning fee is presented in the table on the <br />following page and further discussed in Section 4. <br /> <br />Park Impact Fee Nexus Study, 2004 <br />County of Contra Costa <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />DRAFT REPORT <br /> <br />6-11 <br />