Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />to <br />in its current state can be to a reasonable use under Official the <br />is under utilized as was the case of the above identified addressed properties. The <br />Community Development Staff has determined that the vacant property can be <br />to a reasonable and practical use under the official controls if the appropriate <br />variances are granted. <br /> <br />5.9 The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created <br />by the landowner: The Beauclaire situation is unique. In 1964, the County had <br />previously graded this lot and provided (at that time) a driveway access to the lot. Most <br />double frontage parcels in Roseville abut the rear yard adjacent to collector or alierial <br />roadways such as County Road B or C. In the past five years, the City has approved land <br />division for a few double frontage parcels (such as Burke Street), but none that included <br />variances. The Community Development Staff has determined that the plight of the <br />landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the <br />landowner. <br /> <br />5. 1 0 The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: Although <br />approving this variance would create a parcel that has less width and square footage than <br />others in the general vicinity, it is not a departure from past council action. Three <br />additional parcels have been created since the land was originally platted, which do not <br />meet the requirements of the current Code and are similar in shape and size to the <br />Beauclaire proposaL The Community Development Staff has determined that a lot <br />depth and lot variance for each parcel, if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the locality, nor adversely affect the public health, safety, or general <br />welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. <br /> <br />6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />a. The Community Development Staff recommends approval of a 25 foot lot width <br />variance and a 1,820 sq. ft. lot size variance to Section 1004.016 (Residential <br />Dimensional Requirements) new , and 25 foot a ,5 <br />sq. ft. lot size variance Section 1004.016 (Residential Dimensional Requirements) <br />for pre-existing non confonning Parcel "B", and a minor subdivision to allow the <br />creation of two substandard residential parcels for property located at 1758 Alta <br />Vista Drive based on the findings in Section 5 of the project report dated April 6, <br />2005 and the following conditions: <br /> <br />b. The City policy is to require payment of the Metro Area Sewer Availability <br />Charge (SAC) upon the issuance of a building permit. In this case, a $1,350 SAC <br />fee is required and will be collected with the issuance of a building permit for <br />Parcel "A". <br /> <br />c. The applicant must record the two lot minor subdivision survey within 60 days <br /> <br />PF3626 RPCA 040606 Page 4 of 5 <br />