Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />6. <br /> <br /> <br />&PID <br /> <br /> <br />or <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />State exactly <br />City <br /> <br /> <br />is <br /> <br />to be <br /> <br />on or <br /> <br />property <br /> <br />not <br /> <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />A. Narrative: A written narrative, in support of a variance application, in necessary. <br />This narrative should fully explain the "hardship(s)" that justify the departure from <br />the strict application of the Code. The term "hardship" or "undue hardship" <br />typically refers to physical characteristics of the property, such as shape, soH <br />conditions, or extreme topography. Neither mere inconvenience, nor reduction in <br />value alone, is sufficient to justify a variance. The inability to put property to its <br />highest and best use is not considered a hardship or practical difficulty. The problem <br />that justifies the variance must be caused by conditions beyond the control of the <br />applicant. The applicant cannot create the condition that requires the variance. <br /> <br />B. Proposed plans (1 Copy) including site plan are required. In addition, landscape <br />grading and drainage plan, and exterior building elevation drawings sho'wing <br />building materials may also be required if deemed necessary by the Community <br />Development Department. Such drawings shaH be 8-1I2"x11" or 11 "x17"or PDF <br />digital format. <br /> <br />C. In cases of multiple variances, the applicant may be required to submit a property <br />boundary and building survey. <br /> <br />9. Signature: The above statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. <br /> <br />Applicant Signature: <br /> <br />Property Owner Signature: <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />Phone #: <br /> <br />Fax#: <br /> <br />E-mail Address: <br /> <br />Revised December 24, 2003 <br /> <br />Q:\Planning_Zoning\Application Forms\Revised Variance Application TP.doc <br />Page 20f2 <br />