pf_03638 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

on set place non-conformities that may have not Code and the date which specific requirements were adopted has been difficult to determine (such as requirements forbidding detached accessory structures and sheds from a front yard). However, it is clear that the garage cannot be replaced reasonably without a variance. The side or rear yard present numerous slope, access, and vegetation issues and potentially other variances. The most practical and logical location is the front (west) yard. The City Planner has determined that the property can be put to a reasonable use under the official controls if V ARIANCES to Section 1004 and 1016 are granted. 5.9 The plhrht of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and not created bv the landowner: The property addressed at 2824 Lakeview Avenue is unique. The property was approved by the Village of Roseville in 1970 as the Mogren's Subdivision, which approval created 2 land locked parcels, accessed via a shared private easement. The property has a steep slope to the east and virtually no ability to relocate a detached accessory structure in the side yard. Under the circumstances, the current location of the detached accessory building is the most reasonable and practical for the parcel. The City Planner has determined that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. 5.10 The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: Though the proposed accessory building is larger than the existing structure and it requires a Conditional Use Permit, the structure and its use has similarities to other lots and will have minimum additional impact on the adjacent residential propeliies or the neighborhood. The Staff has determined that the proposed VARIANCES to Sections 1004 of the Roseville City Code will not alter the essential character of the locality, nor adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. 6.0 REVIEW of CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: 6.1 Section 1013.01 requires the City to consider the following criteria when reviewing a Conditional Use Permit: a. Impact on traffic b. Impacts on parks, streets and other public facilities c. Compatibility of the site plan, internal circulation, landscaping and structure with contiguous properties d. Impact of the use on market value of contiguous properties e. Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare f. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan PF3638_RCA_052305.doc- Page 4 of6