My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03642
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3600
>
pf_03642
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:40:51 PM
Creation date
6/14/2006 9:37:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3642
Planning Files - Type
Rezoning
Address
1445 COUNTY ROAD B W
Applicant
TCF Bank
Status
Approved
PIN
102923340005
Date Final City Council Action
6/13/2005
Date Final Planning Commission Action
6/1/2005
Planning Files - Ordinance #
1321
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />explained <br /> <br /> <br />plan has <br /> <br />lanes <br /> <br />to Pascal. <br /> <br />Member Bakeman explained that the Bridgeman Building at Lexington and Burke was <br />done similarly (side entrance not on Lexington). <br /> <br />Member White explained the bank has been on the site for years. The zoning to "B-2" is <br />one issue, while the drive lane/access is a separate issue. <br /> <br />Chair Traynor closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Chair Traynor noted a bank has been on the site for years. Same recommendation to <br /> <br />Chair Traynor closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Motion: Motion by Member Bakeman, seconded by Member Boerigter, to recommend <br />approval of the Rezoning from B-1 Limited Business District to B-2, Retail Business <br />District, based on the information contained in Section 5 of the project report dated June <br />1,2005. <br /> <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Motion: Motion by Member Bakeman, seconded by Member Pust, to direct staff to <br />review site plan, pedestrians' safety, traffic to handle the access from County Road B. <br />The applicant and County will be consulted/engaged by staff to consider no access or <br />limited access on County Road B. <br /> <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Discussion on motion: <br />Deb Bloom explained the motion may be too strong. There is no technical <br />recommendation to eliminate access. Staff and County should wark on access issues. <br />Member Bakeman asked that further review be handled by staff and County. She said no <br />impact has been studied regarding Pascal entry/exit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.