Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 26,2015 <br /> Page 12 <br /> staff could only advise,but the developers would respond to the market and inter- <br /> ested tenants of their choice for this privately-owned property. With the access <br /> decision forwarded to staff by Ramsey County earlier today, Mr. Bilotta opined <br /> that this may cause one potential tenant to rise above the others. <br /> Knowing that hotel properties were anticipated adjacent to this development site, <br /> Mayor Roe opined that an Aldi's didn't seem to be the best fit, and synergistically <br /> that may be taken into account as well. Mayor Roe noted that he had heard from <br /> various sources in the community that Roseville already had enough chain-type <br /> food establishments, and while nice, the desire was to have more unique opportu- <br /> nities. <br /> Etten moved, McGehee seconded, approval of the proposed The Cleveland Club <br /> PRELIMINARY PLAT as presented for the property located at 2700 Cleveland <br /> Avenue; based on the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission <br /> and content as detailed in the RCA dated January 26, 2014, subject to the ten (10) <br /> conditions as listed in that RCA. <br /> Councilmember Etten expressed his interest in persuading Ramsey County to get <br /> the turn lanes installed at developer expense now, and remove future costs for res- <br /> idents and taxpayers. <br /> Mayor Roe encouraged individual Councilmembers to lobby their Ramsey Coun- <br /> ty Commissioner. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte echoed public comments heard tonight, as well as those <br /> of Mayor Roe, specifically related to a potential Aldi's store in Roseville, with <br /> one already located in Little Canada, and two Cub Food Stores in Roseville. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte opined hat, at some point, the area could not support <br /> duplicative establishments, and therefore, she encouraged the creation of a differ- <br /> ent establishment other than Aldi's to prevent another duplication. <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned if staff was aware of whether the developer <br /> had contacted existing liquor license holders regarding acquiring a license, which <br /> could determine a potential tenant. <br /> Mr. Bilotta advised that the developer had indicated that they may have access to <br /> a license; however, staff had no additional information at this time. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that there may be more than one liquor license <br /> available, so she didn't think that would be an issue for a potential grocer tenant. <br /> Councilmember McGehee also spoke in support of the public comments request- <br /> ing that the discount format of this corner be addressed, especially given the sig- <br /> nificant amount of community distress over the WalMart development. Given the <br /> walkability north of the development and residential neighborhood of 500 plus <br />