My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03471
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03471
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:41:47 PM
Creation date
5/8/2007 10:54:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3471
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
2001 FULHAM ST N
Project Name
Villas at Midland Hills
Applicant
United Properties
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
8/22/2005
Date Final Planning Commission Action
10/1/2003
Planning Files - Ordinance #
1311
Planning Files - Resolution #
10158
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />a <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />12 <br />3 <br />4 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br /> <br />a Residence <br />with an General Residence District and <br />Townhome a Plat that takes 9 lots and creates 6 home <br />with common area and I condominium lot with common area; and a General Planned <br />Unit Development for a 30 unit condominium and 6 town home structures - 3 units <br />on 5-1/2 acres located along Roselawn Avenue and Fulham Street. <br /> <br />He explained the proposed setbacks for the townhomes and the <br />the units. He the Tutor design for the and <br /> <br />and the <br /> <br /> <br />the Code, parking, <br />Rice Creek Watershed. <br />to be relocated the <br /> <br />of this and the four actions necessary to <br />final documents, subject to conditions listed in the staff report dated October I, 2003. <br /> <br /> <br />Member clarification on the <br />throughout the community. He also asked if there were other RI to R3 rezonings. <br />Traynor asked what the Rice Creek Watershed District will review and when the project <br />reviewed by them. Thomas Paschke explained the process of adopting a "concept" prior to <br />Watershed review. <br /> <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />about <br /> <br />Bakeman asked if Fulham is <br />of the building (52' to 59'). <br /> <br />66 <br /> <br />Chair Mulder asked if parking will be on both street or at all. Code does not <br />41 allow for parking on roads 24' width or less. Is there an agreement or easement to allow a portion <br />42 of the golf course parking for the condo over-flow? (yes) Chair Mulder asked for details on other <br />43 areas rezoned from Rl and Bl to R3. Thomas Paschke explained more than 20 have <br />44 been similarly rezoned. He said this is not an uncommon practice in the developed suburbs for <br />45 infill or redevelopment. <br />46 <br />47 No other questions from the Planning Commission were offered. <br />48 <br />49 Brian Carey, United Properties, explained the use of the site and the development concept. The <br />50 project is marketed to empty nesters and seniors. There are issues which must be resolved. He <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.