pf_03178 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

o Community Development unaware Midland Hills that the would preclude a scenic course the special function room. The CUP is specific on what formal consideration by the Planning Commission and action by the However, a modification to the berm is not indicated as requiring Council approval. has determined that Section 1013.08(H) Code allows the to whether formal action is necessary. the circumstances, the DRC did not proposed benn modification would cause the berm to in a manner approved, given a consistent same evergreen tree 3 states: "Midland CUP to construct the berm was granted on Section 1010.03 lasted for only months, expiring on September 27, Hills begun construction of the berm. Therefore, Midland Hills is required to new conditional use before it can begin construction of the revise berm." . You are correct that the City Council approved the CUP on March 27,2000, but expiration date is premised on obtaining a building permit. In the case of Midland Hills, they received separate permits to construct utilities, footings/foundation, structure. All three of these permits required some form of grading approval. However, the building permit included the approved site, grading, and landscape plans and was issued the City on June 23, 2000, well within the six-month time line established under 1313.03 of the Roseville City Code. In summary, the Community Development Department and the DRC has approved the minor modification to the original grading plan for the Midland Hills Country Club site development project. We have contacted Midland Hills regarding our final determination and indicated that they can proceed with the completion of the berm and the installation of all the evergreen trees. Staff has also noted this approved modification on the original grading plan.