Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />5.3 David questioned process a <br />directing members and guests to the Club should be located on Cleveland <br />Avenue. <br /> <br />5.4 Ms. Cathy Croughan asked about storm water piping and potential for <br />of existing vegetative cover and that the berm be extended south and include <br />additional conifer trees to further screen her from the parking lot and building. <br /> <br />5.5 Joe Olsen indicated a concern the proposed structure not being <br />compatible with the adjacent residential properties. He also expressed a concern <br />over the banquet room, its location, additional activity, and additional noise <br />to the location being closer to the adjacent residential properties. Olsen also <br />expressed interest in a condition restricting the use of outdoor audio systems. <br /> <br />5.6 Mr. Ed Sucoff expressed concern with the size of the structure and indicated he <br />felt it was too large for a suburban site. He proposed conditions be placed on the <br />project that required the landscape and parking lot lighting plans be approved <br />by the City Council; that no access be allowed to Midland Road or <br />Rosewood Lane; that a noise impact study should be completed and an <br />abatement plan created for the parking lot and patio areas; and that the <br />Commission postpone consideration until final plans are complete. <br /> <br />5.7 Mr. Erli Chan expressed concern over the structure location, the buffer, and the <br />administrative approval of a 10% change. <br /> <br />6.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> <br />6.1 On February 9, 2000, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing <br />regarding the Midland Hills request. The Planning Commission reviewed the <br />findings and following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted (6-0) <br /> <br />PF3 I 78 - ReA (03 I 300) Page 9 of 10 <br />