My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_0223_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_0223_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2015 1:19:04 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 2:19:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Another design element that has arisen since the Feasibility Study was accepted by the City Council <br />34 <br />is the deficient design of the roadway profile for the current 40 mile per hour posted speed limit. <br />35 <br />While staff supports designing and building roadways to accommodate the prevailing and posted <br />36 <br />speed on a roadway, the existing vertical curves on Victoria Street would require the roadway to be <br />37 <br />elevated by as much as three feet in some sections on the north end of the project in order to meet <br />38 <br />Mn/DOT State Aid design requirements for a 40 mile per hour speed, which is the current posted <br />39 <br />speed limit on Victoria. This change in vertical profile grade would have significant impacts on the <br />40 <br />adjacent properties and their driveways. <br />41 <br />One option to avoid this impact would be to declare the roadway an urban section, as allowed per <br />42 <br />State Statutes, and reduce the posted speed limit to 30 miles per hour. This would then allow us to <br />43 <br />design the roadway to this new speed limit and the current roadway profile could be left as it exists <br />44 <br />today. <br />45 <br />Staff is not making this recommendation lightly and recognizes the potential for setting a precedent <br />46 <br />on future projects. However, there are several elements that support this change in this particular <br />47 <br />case: <br />48 <br />1.The roadway was transferred over from Ramsey County to local ownership in 1996. At that <br />49 <br />time, it was recognized that the roadway no longer met a regional purpose but was now <br />50 <br />acting as a local collector. <br />51 <br />2.There are two significant horizontal curves on the corridor, the radius of each only meet a 20 <br />52 <br />mile per hour design speed. A speed transition of 10 miles per hour between posted and <br />53 <br />curve design speed is a better situation than the 20 mile hour transition that exists today. <br />54 <br />3.An all way stop is located at one of the two horizontal curves. <br />55 <br />4.The corridor is heavily residential with several driveways having direct access to Victoria <br />56 <br />Street. <br />57 <br />Given these considerations and in the effort to avoid impacts to residential properties, staff is <br />58 <br />recommending that Council adopt the attached resolution (Attachment B) and declare Victoria Street <br />59 <br />to be an urban district from Larpenteur Avenue to County Road B and establish the statutory speed <br />60 <br />limit of 30 miles per hour. <br />61 <br />PO <br />OLICYBJECTIVE <br />62 <br />Because this is a street reconstruction project, the City’s policy is to assess a portion of the costs <br />63 <br />as allowed for in State Statute 429. Assuming this project is completed by fall 2015, the final <br />64 <br />assessment amount would be determined following a thorough review of the proposed <br />65 <br />assessments by the Council at an assessment hearing in the fall of 2016. These assessments can <br />66 <br />either be paid up front in the fall of 2016, or be put against taxes payable in 2017 for 15 years at <br />67 <br />around 5.5% (rate set at time of hearing). <br />68 <br />The feasibility report details the proposed design, neighborhood impact, estimated cost and <br />69 <br />proposed funding for the construction of these public improvements. Assessment shall be <br />70 <br />equivalent or less than the anticipated increase in market value for properties being assessed. It <br />71 <br />is the City’s policy to assess the cost to construct a 32 foot wide 7-ton road to adjacent property <br />72 <br />owners as follows: <br />73 <br />Adjacent residential property owner assessed for up to 25% of the cost. <br />74 <br />All other adjacent property zoning assessed for up to 50% of the cost. <br />75 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.