My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_0223_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_0223_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2015 1:19:04 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 2:19:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
At the October pubic meeting regarding this project, residents expressed <br />interest about parking and street width; would the street need to be widened to <br />support parking. Many residents did not want the roadway to be widened, but <br />also wanted to maintain some parking. Also, there was some discussion about <br />mailbox locations as all mailboxes are currently located on the east side of <br />Victoria while the majority of homes are located on the west side of the <br />roadway. <br />As a result of these discussions a survey was sent to residents asking about both <br />mailbox locations and on street parking. 54 surveys were mailed and we <br />received 27 responses. <br />The results of the survey are as follows: <br /> MAILBOXES PARKING <br /> Move to Keep on Restrict Restrict Allow Parking <br />West Side East Side Both Sides One Side Both Sides <br />North of <br />3 5 5 3 0 <br />Roselawn <br />South of <br />17 2 9 7 3 <br />Roselawn <br />Total 20 7 14 10 3 <br />It is helpful to separate the results between the north side of Roselawn Avenue <br />and the south side as all of the homes south of Roselawn Avenue are on the <br />west side of Victoria Street. North of Roselawn Avenue, about a third of the <br />homes are on the east side. Also, as indicated previously in this report, Victoria <br />Street is essentially a rural design south of Roselawn Avenue and effectively an <br />urban design north of Roselawn Avenue. <br />While the survey results show the majority of the respondents favored <br />restricting parking on BOTH sides many of the comments on the returned <br />surveys made it clear that residents misunderstood the amount of widening, if <br />any, necessary to support parking on one side. State Aid standards require a <br />minimum roadway width of 32 feet to support parking on one side of the <br />roadway and 38 feet for parking on both sides of the roadway. This was <br />discussed in more detail at the December Public Meeting and staff is <br />recommending the 32 foot wide pavement section with parking on one side of <br />the street. A follow up survey will be sent to residents to clarify this issue and <br />the results will be available for the Public Hearing in February. <br />AMENDMENT: A follow up survey was conducted in February of 2015. There <br />were a total of 17 responses which included 9 votes for restricting parking on <br />both sides and 8 votes for allowing parking on one side of Victoria Street. <br />Based on these results, staff continues to recommend providing parking on <br />one side of the roadway. <br /> <br />Project P-ST-SW-15-02 Feasibility Report <br />Victoria Street Reconstruction <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.