Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br />1 <br />Attachment B <br />2 <br />3 <br />DATE: <br />August 25, 2011 <br />4 <br />5 <br />TO: <br />City Manager Bill Malinen <br />6 <br />7 <br />FROM: <br />Chief Rick Mathwig <br />8 <br />9 <br />SUBJECT: <br />Forfeiture Information <br />10 <br />11 <br />This memorandum is in response to Mayor Roe’s request for a report related to questions raised <br />12 <br />by a citizen. <br />13 <br />14 <br />Property seized and ultimately forfeited by the Roseville Police Department is governed by <br />15 <br />Minnesota statutes: 169A.63 as it pertains to vehicle forfeitures for aggravated drunk driving <br />16 <br />arrests, and 609.531 as it pertains to vehicle and property seized for designated offenses <br />17 <br />such as narcotics, burglary, and other crimes. <br />18 <br />19 <br />Other property forfeited by the Police Department, not governed by Minnesota statutes, is <br />20 <br />generally related to our narcotics officer assigned to the Ramsey County’s Violent Crime <br />21 <br />Enforcement Team (VCET). A percentage of their forfeitures are in concert with federal <br />22 <br />agencies such as the DEA. Those forfeitures are under the direction of federal laws which <br />23 <br />are similar to those in Minnesota. <br />24 <br />25 <br />Each Minnesota statute contains numerous subdivisions which strictly control forfeitures <br />26 <br />and the appeal processes afforded to those whose property is seized by law enforcement. <br />27 <br />28 <br />Upon seizure of property to be forfeited the owner is issued a receipt for the property and is <br />29 <br />issued written documentation on how to contest the seizure in court. This information is <br />30 <br />written in multiple languages and the law enforcement agency must be certain the person <br />31 <br />understands the seizure and the appeal process or the seizure will be considered invalid. <br />32 <br />33 <br />Once property has been legally seized and forfeited state statutes dictate how the proceeds <br />34 <br />should be dispersed. This process differs among crimes, but involving aggravated DWI <br />35 <br />offenses, the law enforcement agency retains seventy percent of the proceeds and thirty <br />36 <br />percent is forwarded to the prosecuting attorney. For crimes involving narcotics, burglary, <br />37 <br />etc., percentages differ but in general the law enforcement agency retains seventy percent <br />38 <br />of the proceeds, twenty percent is forwarded to the prosecuting attorney and the remaining <br />39 <br />ten percent is sent to the State of Minnesota’s Crime Victim’s Fund. <br />40 <br />41 <br />The Minnesota Peace Officers Standards and Training Board (POST) is the state entity that <br />42 <br />holds all professional licenses of peace officers in Minnesota. POST provides many <br />43 <br />functions one of which is offering model policies based on best practices in law <br />44 <br />enforcement. Some of the model policies are considered mandatory; Procession of Property <br />45 <br />Seized for Administrative Forfeiture is a required policy of all law enforcement agencies in <br />46 <br />Minnesota. The model policy was implemented in 2011. The model policy did not change our <br />47 <br />forfeiture operations in any significant manner. <br />48 <br />49 <br />Minnesota statutes mandate every forfeiture be reported to the Office of the State Auditor. <br />50 <br />