My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_0223_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_0223_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2015 1:19:04 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 2:19:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Marc Culver, PE February 12, 2015 <br />City of Roseville Page 6 <br /> <br />Intersection Capacity Analysis <br />An operations analysis was conducted to determine how traffic will operate at the study intersections <br />under existing conditions. All intersections were analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic software and <br />the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Intersection operations analysis results identify a Level of <br />Service (LOS) which indicates how well an intersection is operating. Intersections are ranked from <br />LOS A through LOS F. The LOS results are based on average delay per vehicle, which correspond <br />to the delay threshold values shown in Table 1. LOS A indicates the best traffic operation and <br />LOS F indicates an intersection where demand exceeds capacity. Overall intersection LOS A <br />through D is considered to be acceptable traffic flow conditions based on MnDOT guidelines. <br />Table 1.Level of Service Criteria for Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections <br />Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection <br />LOS Designation <br />Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) Average Delay/Vehicle (seconds) <br /> 10 10 <br />A <br />> 10 - 20 > 10 Ï 15 <br />B <br />> 20 - 35 > 15 Ï 25 <br />C <br />> 35 - 55 > 25 Ï 35 <br />D <br />> 55 - 80 > 35 Ï 50 <br />E <br />> 80 > 50 <br />F <br />For side-street stop controlled intersections, special emphasis is given to providing an estimate for <br />the level of service of the minor approaches. Traffic operations at an unsignalized intersection with <br />side-street stop control can be described in two ways. First, consideration is given to the overall <br />intersection level of service. This takes into account the total number of vehicles entering the <br />intersection and the capability of the intersection to support these volumes. <br />Second, it is important to consider the delay on the minor approach. Since the mainline does not <br />have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed to the minor approaches. It is typical of intersections <br />with higher mainline traffic volumes to experience increased levels of delay (i.e. poor levels of <br />service) on the side-street approaches, but an acceptable overall intersection level of service during <br />peak hour conditions. <br />Results of the existing operations analysis shown in Table 2 indicate that all study intersections <br />currently operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better during the p.m. peak hour with the <br />existing geometric layout and traffic control, except along County Road C at the Lincoln Drive and <br />Snelling Avenue intersections, which operate at LOS F. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.