2015-01-27_PWETC_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Various portions of the code were reviewed with the Commission, with staff attempting to simplify language and references for the general public to better understand (e.g. Section 802.08) and other agency requirements as well. Section 802.08 Member Cihacek pointed out apparent language missing (e.g. "this") in reference to prohibited discharges including but not limited to... Section 802.11 Staff reviewed staff options for entry upon private property, and alternate language proposed for a licensed plumber to provide an acceptable certification of an inspection to meet UI requirements as an option beyond staff performing inspections if so desired by the property owner. 802.12 Specific to rates and charges, staff advised that the intent was to address these (e.g. surcharges for non-compliance) as part of the annual review of City fees reviewed and adopted by the City Council via resolution versus continually changing ordinances. Discussion ensued regarding how "certified" inspections would be handles and requirements for that certification if staff was not welcomed by the property owner to perform this due diligence and how inspections could be verified and legitimate. Mr. Schwartz referenced a court case in Little Canada in the recent past when a property owner refused the City entrance into their home, resulting in a court finding that the City could not demand access to perform sump pump inspections. However, Mr. Schwartz noted that the court determined that a city did have the ability to shut off water/sewer service to encourage property owners to allow access in some situations, but not in a sump pump inspection situation, thereby leaving a city with no recourse. Mr. Schwartz advised that this had prompted cities to find alternative ways to have a sump pump inspection certified by a third party. Ms. Giga advised that, as part of the water meter replacement program, the City anticipated 5,000 additional homes available for sump pump inspections; with the certification process an option available for those homes with new meters already installed. At the request of Member Seigler, Mr. Schwartz clarified that this was applicable for any home currently without an automated meter; with 6,000 remaining to be done, 5,000 under the contract approved with Ferguson Waterworks and the other 1,000 to be completed by City staff Mr. Schwartz advised that, for those homes with no sump pump, the inspection sheet would indicate that no sump pump existed, but with those homes constructed prior to foundation drains being Page 4 of 14