Laserfiche WebLink
At the request of Chair Stenlund, Mr. Brokke estimated the life cycle for pathway <br /> machines was ten years, with one currently due for replacement and intended to <br /> be retained as a back-up since it had little if any trade-in value due to its age and <br /> the considerable beating the machines took during their life cycle. <br /> At the request of Chair Stenlund, Mr. Brokke reviewed efforts of the departments <br /> in addressing pathway pavement irregularities (e.g. frost heaves, tree roots, <br /> handicapped accessibility issues); and continual and/or periodic inspections of the <br /> entire system for repairs before the winter season. <br /> Mr. Schwartz noted that the entire trail and pathway network was included in the <br /> PMP so they were rated every 4-5 years and built into the Capital Improvement <br /> Program (CIP) based on their condition index. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding types or configurations of roads and plowing <br /> concerns (e.g. roundabouts, cul-de-sacs, turn lanes at intersections); and <br /> prioritization for plowing City streets and/or pathways as applicable with schools, <br /> residential areas, and major thoroughfares to bus stops receiving some of the <br /> higher priorities, some of which were noted on the plowing route maps provided, <br /> with collector streets, obviously serving higher traffic volumes, among the first to <br /> be plowed. <br /> Member Gjerdingen noted his prior request to staff to include the pathway and <br /> street policies on the City's website for public information; and suggested an <br /> additional comment be included on the street policy, with his comments, intended <br /> as a disclaimer or as a way to connect the pathway and street plowing policies, <br /> provided as a bench handout, attached hereto and made apart hereof. Member <br /> Gjerdingen commended staff for their response with snow removal and the great <br /> job they did in accomplishing the task. However, part of Member Gjerdingen's <br /> concerns, in Section 407.03 of City Code, were that commercial property owners <br /> needed to be reminded that they needed to maintain their areas. <br /> Chair Stenlund noted the need to also consider MS4 issues to continually make <br /> the public aware of why it was necessary to keep trails flush with and avoid new <br /> vegetation growing higher than the pavement, affecting ice accumulation and <br /> creating issues with materials not leaving debris for water or ice collection. Chair <br /> Stenlund advised that this was his rationale in the "pick-up"versus "flicking" <br /> systems of pathway maintenance; and asked that when staff considered new <br /> equipment then look at grooming turf to continue drainage to the gutter line <br /> versus creating an ice ridge where vegetation could grow over time (e.g. along <br /> County Road Q. <br /> At the request of Chair Stenlund, Mr. Brokke advised that those areas <br /> inadvertently damaged during snow removal operations, were addressed by staff <br /> as time allowed or by homeowners in some cases, or a combination of both <br /> Page 9 of 14 <br />