My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-03-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2015
>
2015-03-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2015 4:11:35 PM
Creation date
3/19/2015 4:09:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/24/2015
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
217 Discussion included past grants for private sewer laterals funded with state <br />218 bonding money awarded by the Met Council and pending legislation to offer a <br />219 similar process for cities to have available yet again; cost economies available for <br />220 large scale projects versus on an individual basis; additional costs for <br />221 circumstances occurring during winter weather conditions; and the significant <br />222 amount of money involved. <br />223 <br />224 Member Cihacek suggested a consideration needed to include the cost savings <br />225 component for the City to have uniform lines coming into a main and potential <br />226 cost savings available in other areas; and suggested ost savings analysis could <br />227 provide additional information for this review. <br />228 <br />229 Other Considerations <br />230 • Discretionary immunity issues <br />231 • Determining where problem is located on lateral <br />232 • Lack of service lateral as built information (water tends to be more uniform) — <br />233 private developers and no city records available <br />234 • Fairness to properties that have replace this ' structure <br />235 • Other? <br />236 &111, <br />237 Discussion included replacement scenarios and ability of a homeowner to pay <br />238 costs upfront or over time as a special assessment; and new connections added <br />239 onto road ass ssment costs as applicable. <br />240 <br />241 However, Mr. Schwartz noted tha complete the first phase of the <br />242 Pavement Management Plan (PMP ver the last 20 years, future road <br />243 reconstruction projects would be few and far between, with that investment made <br />244 and with few exceptions for a number of years, most projects would be <br />245 maintenance for mill and overlay versus pavement replacement. Mr. Schwartz <br />246 noted that there would be some water main or sewer main replacement projects <br />247 coming forward where a portion of pavement would be lost to open service lines. <br />248 However, Mr. Schwartz advisethat water service lines tended to have a longer <br />249 life cycle than sanitary sewer h es due to the original material specifications (e.g. <br />250 clay lines). Im <br />251 <br />252 Member Seigler asked if staff was seeing an increase in failures due to the aging <br />253 housing stock in Roseville. <br />254 <br />255 Mr. Schwartz responded affirmatively; however, conversely he noted the <br />256 increasing technologies available in lining sanitary sewer laterals, even though <br />257 they were fairly expensive at this point, which he estimated to be $7,000 to <br />258 $8,000 per individual line. Mr. Schwartz noted that, if there was sufficient <br />259 interest from 100% of the homeowners along a particular line, the entire <br />260 segment's service laterals could be lined at the same time, thereby reducing the <br />261 cost to $2,000 to $3,000 each, again based on the economy of scale. Mr. <br />262 Schwartz noted the advantage for a homeowner to have their laterals lined while <br />Page 6 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.