2015-01-07_VB_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Variance Board Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, January 7, 2015 Page 2 At the request of Member Murphy, Mr. Paschke provided a definition of “canopy” trees 47 within this context as deciduous or over-story trees per ordinance or leaf-bearing versus 48 coniferous in nature. 49 At the request of Member Murphy, under current ordinance, and as referenced in the 50 narrative attached to the report (Attachment C), Mr. Paschke advised that no variance 51 was indicated to provide a certain amount of glazing on the proposed building. 52 Provided rationale was accepted that trees, whether on public or private property, were 53 beneficial to the entire community and for the public good and were subject to code 54 provisions, Chair Boguszewski questioned if in general this would allow for replacement 55 trees elsewhere in the community, or payment in lieu of tree planting or preservation, if a 56 lot was too small to handle the required number of replacement trees due to 57 redevelopment. 58 Mr. Paschke responded that, while such possibilities were still under discussion for 59 potential inclusion in a revised ordinance, the current ordinance did not provide for such 60 an allowance and any requirement for a developer to meet that requirement would be 61 beyond the authority of the City and its staff. Under current code, Mr. Paschke clarified 62 that a property owner was required to either meet current City Code, or seek a variance 63 from that code. In the future, Mr. Paschke noted that a developer may be able to seek 64 relief with one of the options identified by Chair Boguszewski, but at this time it was not 65 applicable. 66 Applicant Representatives: Ben Hartberg 1583 Berkley Avenue, St. Paul, MN, (SP?), 67 Landscape Architect with Tanner Architects, designing the Pizza Lucé facility 68 Using a displayed illustration of proposed green space on the site, along with identifying 69 existing easements along the south property line and along Snelling Avenue, as well as 70 through the development site to facilitate utilities for the Room and Board building to the 71 property’s north, Mr. Hartberg reviewed the difficulties faced in trying to meet landscaping 72 and tree preservation/replacement ordinances. Mr. Hartberg addressed specific heritage 73 trees and their conditions, and the developer’s intent to provide reasonable horticultural 74 efforts to protect them. Mr. Hartberg noted the proposed underground stormwater 75 management system covering the entire back area of the property, and the developer’s 76 intent to preserve existing trees along Lincoln Drive and along Snelling Avenue in 77 accordance with comprehensive plan guidelines. Mr. Hartberg advised that he anticipated 78 considerable vegetation on the site even with easement restrictions. 79 As the City considered revisions to its ordinance in the future, Mr. Hartberg suggested 80 they make the tree preservation aspect, which does not currently consider scale, to avoid 81 penalizing developers and take into consideration the lot size and what could realistically 82 fit on the lot for trees and landscaping. In their specific situation, Mr. Hartberg advised 83 that the penalty was so large without a variance and given the size of the lot, it was 84 prohibitive for redevelopment. Mr. Hartberg referenced other communities that have 85 provided options for park dedication or replanting at other locations, and suggested 86 Roseville consider such options in the future. 87 Ms. J. J. Haywood, 400 Second Avenue N, Minneapolis, MN 55401, co-owner of 88 Roseville Pizza Lucé 89 Ms. Haywood was present, but had no additional comment. 90 Chair Boguszewski closed the Public Hearing at 5:49 p.m.; no one spoke for or against. 91 MOTION 92 Member Murphy moved, seconded by Member Cunningham to adopt Variance 93 Board Resolution No. 111 (Attachment F) entitled, “A Resolution Approving 94 Variances to Roseville City Code, Sections 1011.03C.1 (Parking Lot Landscape) 95 and Section 1011.04F.1 and 2.A (Tree Preservation and Replacement in All 96 Districts) at 2851 Snelling Avenue (PF15-001);” to allow redevelopment of the 97 former Countryside Restaurant site into a new Pizza Lucé location, and based on 98