Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT B <br />ry ,�.w `u�'�' ��: � �� �, �'�' � �� �� �; � �,! �J il°1 I tt a I �, <br />We have noticed that the city inspection report is inaccurate on many points and strongly disagree <br />with many violation listed in the report. There are number of duplicate violations. <br />For example flexible drain connector violation is mentioned 3 times in 175 building report and <br />should be corrected as soon as possible. Check item # 1, 15, and 16. <br />We do understand the necessiry of correcting the flexible drain connector, however, we do not agree <br />with the idea of inentioning it 3 times. Our team has worked hard, efficiently and effectively to <br />implement all city code last year. We take pride in coYrecting any violation as soon we know about it <br />or ciry inspector(s) bring it to our attention. <br />City inspector inspected our 12 buildings in 5 days. Most of the violations were corrected during the <br />inspection, but those violations are still showing in inspection report. For example Garage Roof in <br />disrepair 1740 — our maintenance staff worked overnight and fixed the roof and next day city <br />inspector came and verified. Unsealed opening in brick exterior 1740 building was fixed right away <br />and showed to the inspector, but these repairs are listed as violations in inspection report. <br />We hired an electrician to go through all apaYtments, laundry rooms and common areas to <br />check/repair/ replace every electric issue, smoke alarm, CO alarm, broken outlet/ switches. We paid <br />him around $11,000. Our intent was to fix everything and be ready for inspection. But he still <br />missed a few items mentioned in the report. <br />We hired a handyman to fix and/or replace all screens in all the buildings. He still missed a few <br />screens. Our intent was to meet all ciry requirements. <br />We have more than 50% tenants who are recently immigrated refugees in our buildings. They are <br />very hard on our property. We are having regular meetings with Caretakers and organizations like <br />KOM (Karen organization of MN ), International Insinuate of Minnesota, World reli�f, Arrive <br />Ministries etc. to explain recently moved immigrants (Karen tenants) in their language about <br />following building rules regarding apartment care and sanitation standards. <br />We appreciate the opportiunity to discuss with you the improvements we are doing and the <br />challenges to meet city requirements, and to maintain sanitation standards inside and outside the <br />apartments. We were shocked to see a D license even with two years of improvement efforts. We <br />were expecting a B license if not A, because we did not have any major life and health safety type of <br />Violations. <br />TheYe are violations which can't be corrected right away or before July 2015 because of weatheY <br />such as fixing garage panels, garage doors, painting soffit, fi�ng dumpster enclosure etc. If city <br />inspect our building again in 6 months we wouldn't get enough time to work on these violations and <br />we will get D I.icense again. <br />We are therefore appealing that a reevaluation should be carried out as soon as possible and type of <br />license should be corrected. If reevaluation is not possible with in 30 calendar days, we request you <br />to postpone 6 month (06/30/2015) inspection and waive license fee till January 2016 or later. <br />